维权情境中的自发性认知解放——以业主积极分子的权利意识的演进为例

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文旨在考察业主维权情景中行动者的认知过程。作者提出了理解主观认知的分析框架,并根据权利内容即财产权抑或自治权、权利性质即反应性抑或进取性两个维度,对业主权利意识进行类型学划分。对微博的分析呈现了近年来业主积极分子权利意识的分布和演变状况;访谈结果则显示积极分子对权利意识的认知解放是一个自发、互动的过程,而且抗争面临的阻力促进相似抗争的连结,社会化媒体为类似抗争的串联提供了平台,推动了认知解放过程。本文阐明了在中国情境下框架化和认知解放过程的自发性和互动性,同时指出未来的研究应该从以事件为中心的案例分析转向以议题为核心的抗议事件族的分析。

关键词: 集体行动, 认知解放, 框架化, 权利意识, 业主抗争

Abstract:

Empirical studies on Chinese homeowners' rights-defending activism largely focus on either the political opportunities or the resource mobilization perspective, and often neglect the cognitive process of homeowner activists in developing their rights consciousness. This study attempts to utilize the framing perspective and cognitive liberation to gain an understanding of activists' subjective cognition in their rights defending actions. We propose an analytic framework that examines two aspects of the homeowner rights consciousness:the content of rights (property rights vs. rights to self-governance) and the nature of rights (reactive vs. proactive). The data is collected from Sina Weibo tweets posted by homeowner activists between 2011 and 2015. The results show that activists are universally aware of property rights and are increasingly proactive in seeking self-governance. Subsequent interviews of a group of activists reveal a spontaneous and interactive process of cognitive liberation that comes from both the first-hand experiences and the online discussions with fellow activists. Social media provides a platform upon which activists exchange information and form networks, learn from each other about common issues and obstacles, and as a result, it promotes collective consciousness and facilitates cognitive liberation. In our view, future studies of homeowner rights defending activism should shift from the event-centered case study approach to the issue-centered analysis of the grass-roots rights movement as a whole.

Key words: cognitive liberation, homeowners' protest, collective action, framing, rights consciousness

孙小逸, 黄荣贵. 维权情境中的自发性认知解放——以业主积极分子的权利意识的演进为例[J]. 社会杂志, 2016, 36(3): 140-166.

SUN Xiaoyi, HUANG Ronggui. Spontaneous Cognitive Liberation in the Context of Rights-defending Actions: A Case Study of the Evolution of Homeowner Activists' Rights Consciousness[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2016, 36(3): 140-166.

参考文献

陈映芳. 2006. 行动力与制度限制:都市运动中的中产阶层[J]. 社会学研究 21(4):1-20.
陈鹏. 2010. 当代中国城市业主的法权抗争——关于业主维权活动的一个分析框架[J]. 社会学研究 25(1):34-63.
程秀英. 2012. 从政治呼号到法律逻辑——对中国工人抗争政治的话语分析[J]. 开放时代(11):73-89.
管兵. 2010. 维权行动和基层民主参与——以B市商品房业主为例[J]. 社会 30(5):46-74.
郭巍青、陈晓运. 2011. 风险社会的环境异议——以广州市民反对垃圾焚烧厂建设为例[J]. 公共行政评论(1):95-121.
何艳玲. 2006."邻避冲突"及其解决:基于一次城市集体抗争的分析[J]. 公共管理研究(0):93-103.
何艳玲、钟佩. 2013. 熟悉的陌生人:行动精英间关系与业主共同行动[J]. 社会学研究 28(6):21-45.
李骏.2009,住房产权与政治参与:中国城市的基层社区民主[J].社会学研究 24(5):57-82.
黎相宜. 2009. 精英型与草根型框架借用——比较失地农民与知识精英的集体抗争[J]. 社会 29(6):107-126.
刘春荣. 2010. 选举动员的框架整合——银杏居委会换届选举个案研究[J]. 社会 30(1):22-45.
孙小逸、黄荣贵. 2014. 再造可治理的邻里空间——基于空间生产视角的分析[J]. 公共管理学报(3):118-126.
孟伟. 2007. 日常生活的政治逻辑——以1998-2005年间城市业主维权行动为例[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社.
石发勇. 2010. 业主委员会、准派系政治与基层治理——以一个上海街区为例[J]. 社会学研究 25(3):136-158.
夏瑛. 2014. 从边缘到主流:集体行动框架与文化情境[J]. 社会 34(1):52-74.
曾繁旭. 2009. 社会的喉舌:中国城市报纸如何再现公共议题[J]. 新闻与传播研究 16(3):93-100.
张紧跟、庄文嘉. 2008. 非正式政治:一个草根NGO的行动策略——以广州业主委员会联谊会筹备委员会为例[J]. 社会学研究 23(2):133-150.
张磊. 2005. 业主维权运动:产生原因及动员机制——对北京市几个小区个案的考察[J]. 社会学研究 20(6):1-39.
邹树彬. 2005. 城市业主维权运动:特点及其影响[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版) 22(5):44-49.
朱健刚. 2011. 以理抗争:都市集体行动的策略——以广州南园的业主维权为例[J]. 社会 31(3):24-41.
庄文嘉. 2011. 跨越国家赋予的权利?对广州市业主抗争的个案研究[J]. 社会 31(3):88-113.
Benford, Robert D. 1997. "An Insider's Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective."Sociological Inquiry 67(4):409-430.
Benford, Robert D. and David A. Snow. 2000. "Framing Processes and Social Movements:An Overview and Assessment."Annual Review of Sociology 26:611-639.
Cai, Yongshun. 2008. "Power Structure and Regime Resilience:Contentious Politics in China."British Journal of Political Science 38 (3):411-432.
Cai, Yongshun. and Zhiming Sheng. 2013. "Leaders with Mixed Motivation:Homeowners' Activism in Beijing."The China Quarterly 25:513-532.
Futrell, Robert. 2003. "Framing Processes, Cognitive Liberation, and NIMBY Protest in the U.S. Chemical-Weapons Disposal Conflict."Sociological Inquiry 73(3):359-386.
Gamson, William A. 1995. "Construction Social Protest." InSocial Movements and Culture, edited by Hank Johnston and Bert Klandermans. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press:85-106.
Gui, Yong and Weihong Ma. 2014. "The Institutionalization of Neighborhood Governance:Dilemma and Political Hurdles." InNeihbourhood Governance in Urban China, edited by Ngai-ming Yip. Cheltenham UK:Edward Elgar:59-71.
Ho, Michael H. C. and Tsz-man Kwong. 2002. "Housing Reform and Home Ownership Behaviour in China:A Case Study in Guangzhou."Housing Studies 17(2):229-244.
Hopkins, Daniel J. and Gary King. 2010. "A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science."American Journal of Political Science 54 (1):229-247.
Huang, Ronggui. 2010. "Housing Activism in Shanghai:Opportunities and Constraints." PhD thesis, City University of Hong Kong.
Huang, Ronggui. and Xiaoyi Sun. 2014. "Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China."Information, Communication & Society 77 (1):86-104.
Huang, Ronggui. and Ngai-ming Yip. 2012. "Internet and Activism in Urban China:A Case Study of Protests in Xiamen and Panyu." Journal of Comparative Asian Development 11(2):201-223.
Huang, Youqin. 2004. "The Road to Homeownership:A Longitudinal Analysis of Tenure Transition in Urban China (1949-93)."International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(4):774-795.
Johnson, Thomas. 2010. "Environmentalism and NIMBYism in China:Promoting a Rules-based Approach to Public Participation."Environmental Politics 19(3):430-448.
Johnson, Thomas. 2013. "The Politics of Waste Incineration in Beijing:The Limits of a Top-Down Approach? "Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 15(1):109-128.
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2004. "Political Context and Opportunity." InThe Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule and Hanspeter Kriesi. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing:67-90.
LI, Lianjiang. 2010. "Rights Consciousness and Rules Consciousness in Contemporary China."The China Journal (64):47-68.
McAdam, Doug. 1999.Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. "Resource Mobilization and Social Movements:A Partial Theory."The American Journal of Sociology 82(6):1212-1241.
Nepstad, Sharon Erickson. 1997. "The Process of Cognitive Liberation:Cultural Synapses, Links, and Frame Contradictions in the US.-Central America Peace Movement."Sociological Inquiry 67(4):470-487.
O'Brien, Kevin J. 1996. "Rightful Resistance."World Politics 49(1):31-55.
O'Brien, Kevin J. 2003. "Neither Transgressive nor Contained:Boundary-Spanning Contention in China."Mobilization:An International Journal 8(1):51-64.
Perry, Elizabeth J. 2009. "A New Rights Consciousness."Journal of Democracy 20(3):17-20.
Pickvance, C. G. 1995. "Where Have Urban Movements Gone?" InEurope at the Margins:New Mosaics of Inequality, edited by Costis Hadjimichalis and David Sadler. London:John Wiley & Son Ltd:197-217.
Pratt, Geraldine. 1982. "Class Analysis and Urban Domestic Property:A Critical Reexamination."International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 6(4):481-502.
Read, Benjamin L. 2003. "Democratizing the Neighbourhood? New Private Housing and Home-owner Self-organization in Urban China." The China Journal (49):31-59.
Read, Benjamin L. 2008. "Assessing Variation in Civil Society Organizations."Comparative Political Studies 41(9):1240-1265.
Saunders, Peter. 1978. "Domestic Property and Social Class."International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2(2):233-251.
Shi, Fayong and Yongshun Cai. 2006. "Disaggregating the State:Networks and Collective Resistance in Shanghai."The China Quarterly 186(1):314-332.
Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. "Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation."American Sociological Review 51(4):464-481.
Snow, David A. 2004. "Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields." InThe Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule and Hanspeter Kriesi. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing:380-412.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1988. "National Politics and Collective Action:Recent Theory and Research in Western Europe and the United States."Annual Review of Sociology 14:421-440.
Thornton, Patricia M. 2002. "Framing Dissent in Contemporary China:Irony, Ambiguity and Metonymy."The China Quarterly 171:661-681.
Tilly, Charles. 1978.From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
Wang, Ya Ping and Alan Murie. 1996. "The Process of Commercialisation of Urban Housing in China."Urban Studies 33:971-989.
Yang, Guobin. 2003. "The Co-evolution of the Internet and Civil Society in China."Asian Survey 43(3):405-422.
Yip, Ngai-ming and Yihong Jiang. 2011. "Home Owners United-The Attempt to Create Lateral Networks of Homeowners' Associations in Urban China."Journal of Contemporary China 20(72):735-750.
Yip, Ngai-ming, Ronggui Huang, and Xiaoyi Sun. 2014. "Homeowners' Activism and the Rule of Law in Urban China."China Journal of Social Work 7 (2):175-188.

[1]	盛智明. 组织动员、行动策略与机会结构——业主集体行动结果的影响因素分析[J]. 社会杂志, 2016, 36(3): 110-139.
[2]	卜玉梅. 从在线到离线：基于互联网的集体行动的形成及其影响因素——以反建X餐厨垃圾站运动为例[J]. 社会杂志, 2015, 35(5): 168-195.
[3]	夏瑛. 从边缘到主流：集体行动框架与文化情境[J]. 社会杂志, 2014, 34(1): 52-74.
[4]	吴长青. 英雄伦理与抗争行动的持续性——以鲁西农民抗争积极分子为例[J]. 社会杂志, 2013, 33(5): 204-205.
[5]	林超超. 合法化资源与中国工人的行动主义——1957年上海“工潮”再研究[J]. 社会杂志, 2012, 32(1): 197-219.
[6]	朱健刚. 以理抗争:都市集体行动的策略——以广州南园的业主维权为例[J]. 社会杂志, 2011, 31(3): 24-41.
[7]	庄文嘉. 跨越国家赋予的权利？——对广州市业主抗争的个案研究[J]. 社会杂志, 2011, 31(3): 88-113.
[8]	张荆红. 价值主导型群体事件中参与主体的行动逻辑[J]. 社会杂志, 2011, 31(2): 73-96.
[9]	罗家德;王竞;张佳音;谢朝霞. 社会网研究的架构:以组织理论与管理研究为例[J]. 社会杂志, 2008, 28(6): 15-38 .
[10]	刘玉照. 遭遇修路事件的村庄选举双重选择的集体行动[J]. 社会杂志, 2006, 26(5): 93-109.