占有、经营与治理：乡镇企业的三重分析概念——
重返经典社会科学研究的一项尝试（上）

Abstract

Abstract:

Through the review of the representative sociological studies on ownership of town and township enterprises, this article attempts to use three classical theoretical concepts of possession, operation, and governance to analyze the formative and the operational mechanisms of town and township enterprises. In the aspect of possession, these enterprises compromise different elements of public, common and private ownerships. In the aspect of operation, they utilize land contracts, enterprise contracts and the financial responsibility system in the institutional context of the twotrack regime. In the aspect of governance, they fuse different mechanisms of the institutional, knowledge, and mores dimensions together, and free the traditional familial, kinship linkage, and customary resources for reform and creativity in the practice. As key position of social process of multiple elements and moments, town and township enterprises not only provide opportunities for institutional innovations, but also embody the institutional spirit of reform period, which combines tradition, regime, and new market mechanism, and provides an enriched process of social development. This framework returning on the classical social theories will be conductive to reflection on the other phenomenon of organizational and institutional change in social and economical reform.

Key words: town and township enterprises, ownership, possession, operation, governance

QU Jingdong. Possession, Operation, and Governance as Three Conceptual Dimensions of Town and Township Enterprises: An Attempt Back to the Classical Social Sciences[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2013, 33(1): 1-37.

References

阿尔钦，艾伯特. 1992. 产权［G］//新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典（第3卷）.王林, 译. 第1101-1104页.北京：经济科学出版社.
埃格特森，思拉恩. 1996. 新制度经济学［M］. 吴经邦,等,译. 北京：商务印书馆.
艾勒曼，大卫. 1998.民主的公司制［M］. 李大光, 译. 北京：新华出版社.
曹正汉. 2007. 土地集体所有制：均平易，济困难——一个特殊村庄案例的一般意义［J］. 社会学研究(3)：18-38.
陈家建. 2010. 法团主义与当代中国社会［J］. 社会学研究(2)：30-43.
陈剑波. 1995. 乡镇企业的产权结构及其对资源配置效率的影响［J］. 经济研究(9)：24-32.
德姆塞茨，哈罗德. 2007. 关于产权的理论［G］//经济学基础文献选读. 罗卫东, 编选. 刘守英, 译. 第179-184页.杭州：浙江大学出版社.
科斯，罗纳德.1994. 企业的性质［G］//论生产的制度结构.盛洪、陈郁, 译. 上海三联书店.
拉斯莱特，彼得. 2007. 洛克《政府论》导论［M］. 冯克利，译. 北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店.
李稻葵.1995. 转型经济中的模糊产权理论［J］. 经济研究(4)：42-50.
李汉林、李路路.1999. 资源与交换：中国单位组织中的依赖性结构［J］. 社会学研究(4)：44-63.
刘世定.1999. 嵌入性与关系合同［J］. 社会学研究(4)：75-88.
刘世定.2006.占有制度的三个维度及占有认定机制：以乡镇企业为例［G］//中国社会学(第5卷). 上海人民出版社.
柳新元、张铭. 2002. 论分享制的形式、本质与主要模式［J］. 浙江学刊(2)：197-200.
罗泽尔，司考特、李建光. 1992. 中国经济改革中村干部的经济行为［M］. 北京：经济管理出版社.
毛丹.2010. 村落共同体的当代命运：四个观察维度［J］. 社会学研究(1)：1-33.
米德，詹姆斯.1989. 分享经济的不同形式［J］. 冯举，译.经济体制改革(1-3)：114-123.
邱泽奇.1999. 乡镇企业改制与地方威权主义的终结［J］. 社会学研究(1)：82-92.
渠敬东、周飞舟、应星. 2009. 从总体支配到技术治理：基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析［J］. 中国社会科学(6)：104-127.
塞勒尼，伊万，凯瑟琳·贝克特，劳伦斯·P.金. 2010a. 社会主义经济体制［G］//新古典社会学的想像力. 吕鹏,等,译. 北京：社会科学文献出版社.
塞勒尼，伊万，罗伯特·曼钦. 2010b. 被中断的资产阶级化：社会主义匈牙利家庭农业企业家的社会背景和生活史［G］//新古典社会学的想象力. 吕鹏,等,译. 北京：社会科学文献出版社.
申静、王汉生. 2005. 集体产权在中国乡村生活中的实践逻辑：社会学视角下的产权建构过程［J］. 社会学研究(1)：113-148.
斯威德伯格，理查德. 2007. 马克斯·韦伯与经济社会学思想［M］. 何蓉,译. 北京：商务印书馆.
孙立平.2007. 转型社会学：发展趋势与面临的问题［G］//中国社会科学学术前沿(2006-2007). 北京：社会科学文献出版社.
涂尔干，爱弥尔.2001.社会分工论［M］. 渠东,译. 北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店.
涂尔干，爱弥尔. 2003. 职业伦理与公民道德［M］.渠东, 译. 上海人民出版社.
韦伯，马克斯. 2005a. 经济行动与社会团体［M］. 康乐、简惠美, 译. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社.
韦伯，马克斯. 2005b. 经济与历史支配的类型［M］. 康乐,等, 译. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社.
威廉姆森，奥利弗.1998. 治理的经济学分析：框架和意义［G］//新制度经济学. 菲吕博顿、瑞切特, 编. 孙经纬,译. 上海财经大学出版社.
杨善华、苏红. 2002. 从“代理型政权经营者”到“谋利型政权经营者”——向市场经济转型背景下的乡镇政权［J］. 社会学研究(1)：17-24.
张建君. 2005. 政府权力、精英关系和乡镇企业改制［J］. 社会学研究(5)：92-124.
张静.2000. 基层政权：乡村制度诸问题［M］. 杭州：浙江人民出版社.
张静.2003. 土地使用规则的不确定：一个解释框架［J］. 中国社会科学(1)：113-124.
张静.2005a. 二元整合秩序：一个财产纠纷案的分析［J］. 社会学研究(3)：1-19.
张静.2005b. 法团主义［M］. 北京：中国社会科学出版社.
张军.2006. 双轨制经济学：中国的经济改革(1978—1992)［M］. 上海三联书店.
张五常.2002. 经济解释（卷三）：制度的选择［M］. 香港：花千树出版有限公司.
张闫龙.2006. 财政分权与省以下政府间关系的演变［J］. 社会学研究(3)：39-63.
折晓叶、陈婴婴. 2000. 产权制度选择中的“结构—主体关系”［J］. 社会学研究（5）:64-81.
折晓叶、陈婴婴. 2005. 产权怎样界定：一份集体产权私化的社会文本［J］. 社会学研究(4)：1-43.
郑雄飞.2010. 破解“土地换保障”的困境——基于“资源”视角的社会伦理学分析［J］. 社会学研究（6）：1-24.
周其仁.2002. 产权与制度变迁：中国改革的经验研究［M］. 北京：社会科学文献出版社.
周雪光. 2005. “关系产权”：产权制度的一个社会学解释［J］. 社会学研究(2)：1-31.
周怡. 2006a. 中国第一村：华西村转型经济中的后集体主义［M］. 香港：牛津大学出版社.
周怡. 2006b. 寻求整合的分化：权力关系的独特作用——来自H村的一项经验研究［J］. 社会学研究(5)：50-84.
Caldeira, Rute. 2008. “ ‘My Land, Your Social Transformation’: Conflicts within the Landless People Movement (MST), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.” Journal of Rural Studies 24（2）:150-160.
Cheung, Steven N.S. 1983. “The Contractual Nature of Firm.” Journal of Law and Economics 26(1): 1-21.
Coase, Ronald H.1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3(Oct.): 1-44.
Dahlman, Carl J. 1980. The Open Field System and Beyond: A Property Rights Analysis of an Economic Institution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver D. Hart. 1983. “An Analysis of the PrincipalAgent Problem.” Econometrica 51(1): 7-45.
Feher, Ferenc, Agnes Heller,and Gyrgy Markus. 1983. Dictatorship Over Needs: Analysis of Soviet Societies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Jensen, Michael C. and Wiliam H.Meckling, 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360.
Kornai, Jnos.1959. OverCentralization in Economic Administration: A Critical Analysis Based on Experience in Hungarian Light Industry, translated by John Knapp. London: Oxford University Press.
Kornai, Jnos. 1980. Economics of Shortage. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Lin, Nan.1995. “Local Market Socialism: Local Corporation in Action in Rural China.” Theory and Society 24(3): 301-354.
Locke, John. 1989. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macpherson, Crawford Brough. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nee, Victor. 1989. “A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism.” American Sociological Review 54(5)：663-681.
Oi, Jean C. 1992. “Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China.” World Politics 45(1)：99-126.
Oi, Jean C. 1995. “The Role of the Local State in China’s Transitional Economy.” The China Quarterly 144：1132-1149.
Oi, Jean C. 1999. Rural China Takes off : Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics (36)4: 387-389.
Shue, Vivienne. 1988. The Reach of the State. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Streeck, Wolfgang. 1982. “Organizational Consequences of NeoCorporatist Cooperation in West Germany 1973-1982.” In G. Lembruch and Philippe C. Schmitter (eds.), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, pp.72-73. London: Sage.
Tian, Guoqiang. 2000.“Property Rights and Nature of China’s Collective Enterprise.” Journal of Comparative Economics 28 (2): 247-268.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Yang, Xiaokai, Wang Jiangou, and Ian Wills. 1992. “Economic Growth, Commercialization, and Institutional Changes in Rural China, 1979-1987.” China Economic Review 3(1): 1-37.
Zhou, Kate Xiao. 1996. How the Farmers Changed China：Power of the People. Boulder: Westview Press.
Zoll, Rainer. 1976. Der Doppelcharakter der Gewerkschaften. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

[1]	MENG Qi. The Influence of Governance Structure on the Formation of China's Early Modern Industrial Organization [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2022, 42(1): 1-30.
[2]	HAN Litao. The Governance Logic of Salt Trade Liberalization Reforms in the Mid-Qing Dynasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2022, 42(1): 66-87.
[3]	YAO Dongmin, CUI Lin, ZHANG Pengyuan, ZHOU Xueguang. Choice and Transformation of China's Governance Modes: A Formal Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2021, 41(6): 41-74.
[4]	SHENG Zhiming, ZHOU Qing. Power Space and Governance Performance: An Analysis Based on Shanghai Urban Neighborhood Survey [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2021, 41(5): 1-30.
[5]	ZHAO Yang. “Image Making”: The Storytelling in Xinfang Events [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2021, 41(1): 120-149.
[6]	CHEN Ying fang. Ambiguous Values or Different Goals: An Analysis of Current China's Family Policy and Its Supply Mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2020, 40(6): 71-91.
[7]	ZHANG Jing. Can Groups without Trust Cooperate with Each Other? An Analysis of the Event History of the XW Case [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2020, 40(5): 91-111.
[8]	YAN Yanhua. Authenticity and the Logic of Change：A Study of Industry Governance and Production Practice Based on the Case of Anxi Tieguanyin [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2020, 40(5): 112-136.
[9]	CHEN Tianxiang, XU Yaqian. Technology Autonomy and State Molding: Political Venation and Imagination of the Relationship Between State and Technical Governance [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2020, 40(5): 137-168.
[10]	LIU Heqing. Policy Compliance and Its Influence Factors in Document Governance: Based on National and Provincial Government Rural Policy Documents Data(2008-2018) [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2020, 40(4): 217-240.
[11]	FU Chunhui. Market Towns Since Ming and Qing: The Historical Cause of China's Urbanization Development [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2020, 40(1): 96-123.
[12]	HUANG Xiaochun, ZHOU Li. “Paired Competition”: A New Mechanism for the Innovation of Urban Local Governance [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2019, 39(5): 1-38.
[13]	HU Yuehan. An Analysis of Educational Test Scoring Standard Variation from the Perspective of Control Theory: A Case Study of History Subject Grading of College Entrance Examination in Province X [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2019, 39(5): 162-183.
[14]	SHI Yunqing. “One Ruler Measures to the End”: Rule Hardening in Grassroots Governance——Taking a Pilot Project in Urban Renewal as an Example [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2019, 39(2): 31-57.
[15]	HUANG Xiaoxing, XIONG Huiling. The Dilemma of Social Service in the Context of Transitional Governance in China: The Case Study of Social Work Service in Z City [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2018, 38(4): 133-159.

Possession, Operation, and Governance as Three Conceptual Dimensions of Town and Township Enterprises: An Attempt Back to the Classical Social Sciences

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments