Chinese Journal of Sociology ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 31-57.
Previous Articles Next Articles
SHI Yunqing
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Regarding launching an urban renewal project,the rising social pressure makes the grassroots state harden the rules while the remaining high pressure from the top makes them keep rules elastic,the contradiction between which causes the dilemma in urban development nowadays. Taking a landmark pilot project as an example,via the observation of the practice of rule hardening principle described as “One Ruler Measures to the End”,this article tries to answer the question of how it is possible for power to reproduce its operational space under nowadays-rising regulatory constraint. In this case,the principle of “Rule Hardening” includes both “result” and “process”,and fulfills through three-step mechanism as hardening in external conditions,hardening in compromising rules and hardening in the limitation of bringing to press. Though this mechanism,the grassroots state manages to mobilize the resources embedded in the system and extend the hidden boundary of the hard and rigorously rules on the surface that makes the rules elastic and soft again,but in a more formal,institutional and organizational way. It could be considered as the state correspondence to the rising social protest during last phrase and indicates a more exquisite and unobvious way of governance,which shows the continuously interaction between the state and the society in the long view of history.
Key words: urban renewal, grassroots governance, operational process of power, rule hardening
SHI Yunqing. “One Ruler Measures to the End”: Rule Hardening in Grassroots Governance——Taking a Pilot Project in Urban Renewal as an Example[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2019, 39(2): 31-57.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.society.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.society.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V39/I2/31
陈映芳. 2013. “违规”的空间[J]. 社会学研究(3):162-182. 董海军. 2008. “作为武器的弱者身份”:农民维权抗争的底层政治[J]. 社会28(4): 34-58. 郭伟和. 2010. 街道公共体制改革和国家意志的柔性控制——对黄宗智“国家和社会的第三领域”理论的扩展[J].开放时代(2):61-82. 何艳玲. 2006. 社区建设运动中的城市基层政权及其权威重建[J]. 广东社会科学(1):159-164. 黄冬娅. 2010. 多管齐下的治理策略:国家建设与基层治理变迁的历史图景[J]. 公共行政评论(4):111-140. 黄晓春. 2017. 当前城市基层政府改革的深层挑战——基于机制分析的视角[J]. 江苏行政学院学报(3):114-120. 黄宗智. 2008. 集权的简约治理——中国以准官员和纠纷解决为主的半正式基层行政[J]. 开放时代(2):10-29. 纪莺莺. 2017. 从“双向嵌入”到“双向赋权”:以N市社区社会组织为例——兼论当代中国国家与社会关系的重构[J]. 浙江学刊(1):49-56. 李洁. 2016. 农村改革过程中的试点突破与话语重塑[J]. 社会学研究(3):100-124. 刘玉照、田青. 2009. 新制度是如何落实的?——作为制度变迁新机制的“通变”[J]. 社会学研究(4):133-156. 曼,迈克尔. 2007. 社会权利的来源(第二卷)[M]. 陈海宏,等,译.上海世纪出版集团. 欧阳静. 2009. 运作于压力型科层制与乡土社会之间的乡镇政权以桔镇为研究对象[J]. 社会29(5):39-63. 渠敬东、周飞舟、应星. 2009. 从总体支配到技术治理——基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析[J].中国社会科学(6):104-127. 施芸卿. 2015. 再造城民:旧城改造与都市运动中的国家与个人[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社. 施芸卿. 2017. 草根国家的四张面孔——以一个旧城改造项目为例[J]. 山东社会科学(8):90-94. 史云桐. 2016. “政府造社会”:社区公共服务领域的“社会生产”实践[J]. 社会发展研究(4):47-66. 孙立平、郭于华. 2000. “软硬兼施”:正式权力非正式运作的过程分析——华北B镇定购粮收购的个案研究[G]//清华社会学评论(特辑). 厦门:鹭江出版社:21-46. 孙立平. 2002. 实践社会学与市场转型过程分析[J]. 中国社会科学(5):83-96. 王汉生、刘世定、孙立平. 1997. 作为制度运作和制度变迁方式的变通[J].中国社会科学季刊(21):45-68. 肖林. 2013. 国家渗透能力建设:社区治理挑战下的国家应对策略[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)(6):11-17. 肖瑛. 2014. 从“国家与社会”到“制度与生活”:中国社会变迁研究的视角转换[J]. 中国社会科学(9):88-104. 应星、晋军. 2002. 集体上访行动中的“问题化”过程——西南一个水电站的移民的故事[G]//清华社会学评论(特辑). 厦门:鹭江出版社:80-109. 应星. 2006. 略论叙事在中国社会研究中的运用及其限制[J]. 江苏行政学院学报(3):71-75. 张永宏、李静君. 2012. 制造同意:基层政府怎样吸纳民众的抗争[J]. 开放时代(7):5-25. Deng, Yanhua. 2017. “‘Autonomous Redevelopment’:Moving the Masses to Remove the Nail Households.” Modren China 43(5):494-522.
Neighborhood Politics: Urban Grassroots Power Operating Strategy and the StateSociety Conglutination