Chinese Journal of Sociology ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 111-134.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Collective System and Household Production: A Re-Examination of Production Practice in the Period of Agricultural Collectivization

YAN Yanhua   

  • Online:2023-05-20 Published:2023-06-14

Abstract: This paper re-examines the production practices and their industrial consequences during the period of agricultural collectivization through the case study of a tea-producing village in Anxi. It is found that the social transformation during the collectivization period, on the one hand, led to the widespread "de-skilling" of traditional tea merchant families, that is, through the state's agribusiness transformation and redistribution of skills, the collective system broke the monopoly of production skills inherited within the core family and the family specialization. On the other hand, it brought about the "re-skilling" for the majority of community members, that is, through the "paternalistic" production arrangements of the production team leader, tea production skills were disseminated to a wider range of households. The positive impact of the collectivization system on the local tea industry was the result of the interaction between the logic of state governance and local traditions. As a part of the formal state power structure, the production team leaders in the collectivization period were able to use the power endowed by the state to transform the traditional way of family work, so that the corresponding production arrangements were in line with the interests of the collective to the greatest extent, and it ultimately enabled the smooth development of tea garden production. However, although the family production organization was formally abolished during the collectivization period, the logic of the family organization had continued to a certain extent in the actual production organization. The production team, especially the production team leaders' balancing role between the "public family" and the "small family" played the traditional role of family authority. The study points out that it is these important features of collectivization period-the "paternalistic" style leadership of the production team leaders and the household-based production and marketing arrangements spreading production and marketing skills to the majority of households in the community-that ultimately facilitated the development of the family industry and the local tea economy in the post-collectivization period.

Key words: collectivization, production leader, household production, tea industry