“批判诠释论”视角下的“争吵”事件——一个国际项目实施中的冲突与转向

社会杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 130-135.

“批判诠释论”视角下的“争吵”事件——一个国际项目实施中的冲突与转向

张良广中山大学社会学与社会工作系

张良广中山大学社会学与社会工作系

出版日期:2010-05-25 发布日期:2010-05-25
通讯作者: 张良广中山大学社会学与社会工作系 E-mail:E-mail： zlg85@163.com
基金资助:
此文为联合国儿童基金会与全国妇联合作的“反对对儿童暴力”项目（YS604）的阶段性研究成果。

Critical Hermeneutic Theory about the “Quarrel”： Conflicts and Shifts in the Implementation of an International Project

Zhang Liangguang， Department of Sociology and Social Work， Sun Yatsen University

Zhang Liangguang， Department of Sociology and Social Work， Sun Yatsen University

Online:2010-05-25 Published:2010-05-25
Contact: Zhang Liangguang E-mail:E-mail： zlg85@163.com
Supported by:
Research supported by the project “Violence against Children”（YS604）， which was led by United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund（UNICEF） and AllChina Women’s Federation（ACWF）.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

摘要：社会工作是承载“强烈价值”的专业实践，而“强烈价值”的介入，常常伴随着冲突，其背后正是“批判诠释论”所强调的“理解”与“沟通”的缺失。从“批判诠释论”角度看，“争吵”是彼此缺乏沟通与理解的产物，是实践“沟通互动论”中相对激烈的讨论形式，在一定程度上说明项目“充权”存在异化，专业关系中带有压迫的痕迹。依照“批判诠释论”的社会工作范式，坚固项目过程中平等合作的角色定位，立足自我觉醒与最大可能的相互理解，通过最大限度的沟通对话，才能营造真正意义上的社区。

关键词: 争吵 , 批判诠释论 , 社会工作

Abstract:

Abstract： Social work is a profession that bears “strong values．” But imposing “strong values” often convoys conflicts， which reflects the missing of “understanding and communication” emphasized in the “critical hermeneutic theory．” The author used the “critical hermeneutic theory” in his analysis， viewing the “quarrel” as a product of misplaced understanding and poor communication． In quest for its meaning， quarreling was interpreted in essence as a form of vigorous debating in the “interactive communication theory．” In the author’s opinion， quarrelling， to some extent， revealed the alienation of the “empowerment” in the project and traces of oppression in the professional relationships． The social work working models in the “critical hermeneutic theory，” as suggested by the author， needed to sustain the roles in an equal cooperation while implementing the project， to rely upon selfawareness and mutual understanding at the highest possible level， and then accordingly to maximize communication through dialogue， so as to achieve a community in its real sense．

Key words: the critical hermeneutic theory , quarrel , social work

张良广 . “批判诠释论”视角下的“争吵”事件——一个国际项目实施中的冲突与转向[J]. 社会杂志, 2010, 30(3): 130-135.

参考文献

参考文献（References）

毕恒达．1996．诠释学与质性研究［G］∥胡幼慧，主编．质性研究：理论、方法与本土女性研究实例．台北：巨流图书有限公司．［Bi Hengda． 1996．“Hermeneutics and

Qualitative Research．” in Qualitative Research： Theory， Method and Local Examples of Women’s Studies． Taibei： Chuliu Publisher．］
陈更新、贺玉英．1991．批判理论与社区发展［G］∥批判诠释论与社会研究．上海人民出版社．［Chen Gengxin and He Yuying． 1991． “Critical Theory and Community

Development． ”in Critical Hermeneutic Theory and Social Research．Shanghai People’s Publishing House．］
顾东辉． 2005．社会工作的演进［G］∥社会工作概论．上海译文出版社．［Gu Donghui． 2005． “The Evolution of Social Work．” in The Social Work Introduction

． Shanghai Translation Publishing House．］
古学斌、张和清、杨锡聪．2007．专业限制与文化识盲：农村社会工作实践中的文化问题［J］．社会学研究（6）．［Gu Xuebin， Zhang Heqing，and Yang Xicong． 2007． “

Professional Limits and Cultural Illiteracy：Cultural Issue of the Rural Social Work Practice． ” Sociological Studies（6）．（in Chinese）］
霍克海默．［1937］1989．传统理论与批判理论［G］∥批判理论．李小冰，等，译．重庆出版社．［Horkheimer．（1937）1989． “Traditional and Critical Theory．” in

Critical Theory， translated by Li Xiaobing et al． Chongqing Publishing House．］
黄源协、箫文高、刘素珍．2007．社区意识及其影响因素之探索性研究［J］．台湾：社会政策与社会工作学刊（2）．［Huang Yuanxie， Xiao Wengao， and Liu Suzhen．2007

． “The Exploratory Study about the Sense of Community and Its Influencing Factors． ”Taiwan：Social Policy and Social Work （2）．（in Chinese）］
Martin，P．Y and G．G．O’Connor． 1988．The Social Environment： Open Systems Applications（chapter 2）． New York： Longman．
Palmer， E． P． 1969． Hermeneutics． Evanston， IL： Northwestern University Press．
阮新邦．2005．批判诠释论的理论基础［G］∥迈向崭新的社会知识观．北京大学出版社．［Ruan Xinbang〖KG-*9〗．2005．Towards a New Concept of Social Knowledge．

Beijing： Peking University Press．］ 
Schleiermacher， F． D． E． 1985． “General Hermeneutics： Grammatical and Technical Tnterpretation．” in MuellerVollmer， K．（ed．），The

Hermeneutics Reader： Texts of the German Tradition from the Enlightment to the Present． New York： Basil Blackwell． 
《联合国儿童权力公约》［A］．The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child （UNCRC）］
谢欣如．2002．哈贝马斯沟通理论初探［J］．台湾：哲学与文化（月刊）（3）．［Xie Xinru．2002．“The Preliminary Study of Habermas’s Communication Theory．”

Taiwan： Philosophy and Culture（Monthly）（3）．（in Chinese）］
朱志强． 2000．社会工作的本质：道德实践与政治实践［G］∥华人社会社会工作本质的初探．香港：八方出版社．［Zhu Zhiqiang． 2001． “The Nature of Social Work：

Moral Practice and Political Practice． ” in The Nature of Chinese Social Work． Hong Kong：Globe Publishing Co．］

责任编辑：李聆