社会杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 182-207.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

家庭变动中的反思性体认——以宁夏政策性搬迁安置区的移民为例

薛雯静(), 徐宗阳   

  • 出版日期:2026-03-20 发布日期:2026-05-19
  • 作者简介:薛雯静  北京大学社会学系,E-mail: xuewenjingvara@pku.edu.cn
    徐宗阳  中国社会科学院社会学研究所
  • 基金资助:
    中国社会科学院宁夏国情调研基地项目

Praxis of Embodied Reflection in Family Transitions: A Case Study of Relocated Families in Policy-Driven Resettlement Communities in Ningxia

Wenjing XUE(), Zongyang XU   

  • Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-05-19
  • About author:XUE Wenjing, Department of Sociology, Peking University, E-mail: xuewenjingvara@pku.edu.cn
    XU Zongyang, Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
  • Supported by:
    the Ningxia National Conditions Research Base Project of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS)

摘要:

本文以宁夏政策性搬迁移民为研究对象,分析其在搬迁的家庭变动中感受到的“不安”。研究发现,这种“不安”不是源自个体利益的受损或家庭发展目标施加给个体的经济压力,而是源自个体对自我与关系的“反思性体认”。一方面,移民因对子女发展问题的自我归因而焦虑,因家庭责任的错位而陷入对关系的反思。另一方面,这一过程又会使他们以向里用力的方式行动,最终化解不安。本文认为,“反思性体认”本质上是人站在一个开放性的利益基点去体认他者的责任位置与性情态度,并找到自己心安理得的行动选择的过程。这一过程的行动主体是一个具有扩充性的自我,这个自我使家庭研究可以在一种推广扩充而非对立冲突的预设中去认识“个体—家庭—社会”的关系。

关键词: 反思性体认, 政策性搬迁, 不安感, 扩充性自我

Abstract:

This paper examines the issue of family modernization through the lens of policy-driven relocation. During the 12th Five-Year Plan period, policy-driven relocation in Ningxia created an objectively favorable environment for modernization development, yet the migrants experienced a sense of unease amid family changes. This research finds that this sense of unease does not arise from the damage to individual interests within the family, nor is it equivalent to the economic pressure exerted on individuals by the maximization of family development interests; instead, it stems from individuals' praxis of embodied reflection on the self and relationships. On one hand, the interest basis of the praxis of embodied reflection is not self-enclosed, so the interests of family members will naturally influence their risk perception, leading to anxiety derived from self-attribution for their children's development issues. On the other hand, the praxis of embodied reflection is not only a rational understanding of relationships but also an empathic resonance with others' attitudes. Consequently, migrants not only feel confused due to the contradictions of family responsibilities but also fall into doubt about relationships when family members reveal selfish tendencies in the process of adjusting responsibilities. However, while this process catalyzes a sense of unease, it also prompts individuals to take inward-directed actions, ultimately resolving the unease. This study argues that the praxis of embodied reflection is not an outward reflection starting from and ultimately returning to self-interest, but a process in which each family member-grounded in an open-ended stance of interest-comes to embody an awareness of others' responsibilities, dispositions and attitude amid family changes, and finds action choices that grant them peace of mind. The subject engaged in this praxis is an expandable self, which transcends the individualistic conception of the person in Western family theory. This reconceptualization allows the relationship between the individual, family, and society to be reimagined under a framework of mutual extension rather than opposition.

Key words: praxis of embodied reflection, policy-driven relocation, sense of unease, expandable self