社会杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 83-112.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会学的时代精神求索:以青年马克思的希腊精神史研究为例

张巍卓()   

  • 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-07-24
  • 作者简介:

    张巍卓  中国人民大学社会学理论与方法研究中心、人类学研究所,E-mail:

    ZHANG Weizhuo, Center for Studies of Sociological Theory & Method, Institute of Anthropology, Renmin University of China, E-mail:

The Quest for the Zeitgeist in Sociology: A Case Study of the Young Marx's Research on the Greek Intellectual History

Weizhuo ZHANG()   

  • Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-07-24

摘要:

青年马克思在颠倒黑格尔法哲学里的国家与市民社会之次序而进入对社会内在机制的科学分析之前,就曾扬弃黑格尔及其学派的精神史叙事,并且做了相当充分的廓清“时代精神”之意蕴的工作。马克思敏锐地看到,黑格尔及其学派的精神史经由斯多葛和基督教的唯心主义连通了古典与现代,既造就又反映了现代社会的精神状态,即理性高度发达而意志或生命力却极端孱弱。他通过创造性复活西方精神史中伊壁鸠鲁的人格与思想,确立了此后唯物主义社会学的精神性格。与之前任何一种唯物主义的理论形态不同,青年马克思确立的唯物主义思想雏形象征着个体现实地、真诚地对待自己的态度。他突破了一切想象的和理论的幻觉,反思自己的主体状态,同时强有力地把握自己,相应地在社会行动方面磨炼那种直面并抵抗社会生存条件之压迫的精气神。对此,青年马克思以罗马性同犹太性的对立这一历史哲学的隐喻来呈现。这为当代中国社会学提供了重要启示,即不仅求索“时代精神”是开展社会学研究的前提,而且探索时代精神的深度变革意涵同领会文明的开端也是息息相关的。

关键词: 时代精神, 罗马性, 原子论, 自我意识, 唯物主义

Abstract:

Before the young Marx inverted the order of state and civil society in Hegel's philosophy of law and embarked on a scientific analysis of the inner mechanisms of society, he had already transcended the Hegelian and post-Hegelian narrative of spiritual history and undertaken a substantial clarification of the meaning of the Zeitgeist. Marx keenly observed that the Hegelian conception of spiritual history, which connected classical antiquity with modernity through Stoicism and subsequently through the idealism of Christianity, both produced and reflected a spiritual condition in which reason in modern society had become highly developed, while will, or vital power, had become extremely enfeebled. In contrast, by creatively reviving the figure and thought of Epicurus within the Western spiritual tradition, Marx established the spiritual character of his later materialist sociology. Unlike any previous form of materialism, the embryonic materialist thought developed by the young Marx signified an attitude of confronting oneself realistically and sincerely. He broke through all imaginative and theoretical illusions, reflected upon his own subjective state, and simultaneously took a firm hold of himself, thereby cultivating, in social action, a spiritual disposition to face and resist the oppressive conditions of social existence. This was articulated by the young Marx through the historical-philosophical metaphor of the opposition between Roman character and Jewishness. This offers important insights for contemporary Chinese sociology: not only is the pursuit of the Zeitgeist a prerequisite for sociological research, but exploring the profound implications of the spirit of the age for transformative change is also closely connected to comprehending the origins of civilization.

Key words: Zeitgeist, Roman character, atomism, self-consciousness, materialism