依势博弈：基层社会维权行为的新解释框架

社会杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 96-120.

依势博弈：基层社会维权行为的新解释框架

董海军中南大学公共管理学院社会学系

董海军中南大学公共管理学院社会学系

出版日期:2010-09-20 发布日期:2010-09-20
通讯作者: 董海军中南大学公共管理学院社会学系 E-mail:donghj34@126.com
作者简介:董海军中南大学公共管理学院社会学系
基金资助:
本文为“湖南省情与决策咨询研究”立项课题（0809BZZ9）和中南大学人文社科基金重点立项项目“乡镇社会内的利益博弈类型及政策启示”的阶段性成果

Based Game： A New Explanatory Framework for RightSafeguarding Action in Grassroots Society

Author：Dong Haijun，Department of Sociology，School of Public Administration，Central South University

Dong Haijun，Department of Sociology，School of Public Administration，Central South University

Online:2010-09-20 Published:2010-09-20
Contact: Dong Haijun，Department of Sociology，School of Public Administration，Central South University E-mail:donghj34@126.com
About author:Dong Haijun，Department of Sociology，School of Public Administration，Central South University
Supported by:
The research was supported by the foundation of “The Research of Hunan Province Situation and Policy Decisions Consultation”（0809B229）．

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基层社会的维权行为研究保持着延续性的沟通对话，但需要发展一种更为综合的解释框架来消解已有解释之间的张力。本文借用本土资源性概念“势”的含义，汲取各种解释的合理内核，基于乡镇场域的现实案例提出一种融合性的解释框架——依势博弈，包含知势、造势、借势、用势四个方面，与博弈对象的以势摆平、调解方的中庸调势处于同一维权行为系统中。依势博弈解释框架体现了维权行动的主体多元性、博弈平等性、策略权宜性、因素多样性、内容丰富性等特征，反应了中国基层社会变迁的倾向，拓展基层维权抗争的视角，体现了从官民或者说强弱维权中走向多元化利益博弈，具有更高层次的概括解释力。

关键词: 依势抗争, 维权行为 , 基层社会 , 解释框架

Abstract:

The research on rightsafeguarding actions in grassroots society has kept the dialog ongoing， but it needs a comprehensive explanatory framework to rid the current explanations of their tension． Borrowing the meaning of Shi in a native resource concept and nurtured by the sound core explanatory ideas， the author used a real life township case to suggest an integrated explanatory framework—a Shibased Game with four aspects of perceiving Shi ， creating Shi， lending or borrowing Shi， and applying Shi ， which are in the same rightsafeguarding action system together with the gameobject`s response by Shi and the mediator’s MiddleWay Shi ． This framework displays the rightsafeguarding actor’s plurality， the game`s equality， tactics’ expediency， factors’ diversity， and contents’ richness． It reflects the transitional tendency in the Chinese grassroots society， expands the rightsafeguarding perspective in the grassroots， and exhibits a process from the form of safeguarding rights of the government vs． the civil or the powerful vs． the weak to a game involving multiple interest groups． Thus， this framework possesses a better integrative explanatory power at a higher level．

Key words: Shi based Game , rightsafeguarding action , grassroots society , explanatory framework

董海军 . 依势博弈：基层社会维权行为的新解释框架[J]. 社会杂志, 2010, 30(5): 96-120.

Dong Haijun. Based Game： A New Explanatory Framework for RightSafeguarding Action in Grassroots Society[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2010, 30(5): 96-120.

参考文献

参考文献（References）

布迪厄、华康德．1998．实践与反思［M］李猛，等，译．北京：中央编译出版社．［Bourdieu，Pierre and Loic Wacquant．1998．An Inviaion to Reflexive Sociology． translated by Li Meng．et al．Beijing：Central Compilation & Translation Press．］
Bian Yanjie．1997．“Bringing Strong Ties Back In：Indirect Ties， Network Bridges，and Job Searches in China．”American Sociology Review（62）．
张德胜、金耀基，等．2001．论中庸理性：工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外［J］．社会学研究（2）．［Chang，Tesheng，YeoChi King et al．“On Zhongyong Rationality：Beyond instrumental，value，and communicative rationality．”Sociological Studies（2）．（in Chinese）］
董海军．2008a．塘镇：乡镇社会的利益博弈与协调［M］．北京：社会科学文献出版社．［Dong Haijun． 2008a．Tang Town： the Game and Coordination for Interest in Township Society． Beijing： Social Science Academic Press．（in Chinese）］
董海军．2008b．作为武器的弱者身份：农民维权抗争的底层政治［J］．社会（4）．［Dong Haijun．2008b．“The Weak Identity as a Weapon： Subaltern Politics of the Peasant Resistance for Rights．”Society 28（4）．（in Chinese）］
格兰诺维特，马克．［1973］1998．弱关系的力量［J］．国外社会学（2）．［ Granovetter，M．（1973）1998．“The Strength of Weak Ties．” Foreign Sociology（2）．（in Chinese）］
Granovetter， Mark．1995．Getting a Job： A Study of Contacts and Careers（2nd edition）． University of Chicago Press． Chicago and London．
郭于华．2002．“弱者的武器”与“隐藏的文本”［J］．读书（7）．［Guo Yuhua． 2002．“‘Weapons of the Weak’and‘Hidden Handscript’．”Dushu（7）．（in Chinese）］
李连江、欧博文．1997．当代中国农民的依法抗争［G］∥吴国光，主编．九七效应．香港：太平洋世纪研究所．［Li Lianjiang and O’Brien．1997．“Rightful Resistance by Contemporary Chinese Peasants．”in The 1997 Effect，Hong Kong， China and the Pacific，edited by Wu Guoguang．Hong Kong： The Pacific Century Institute．］
Minzner， Carl．2006． “Xinfang： An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions．” Stanford Journal of International Law 42（1）．
O’Brien， K．1996． “Rightful Resistance．” World Politics 49（1）．
Scott， James C． 1985． Weapons of the Weak： Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance． Yale University Press．
石发勇．2005．关系网络与当代中国基层社会运动［J］．学海（3）．［Shi Fayong．2005．“Relation Network and Grassroots Social Movement in the Contemporary China．”Academia Bimestris（3）．（in Chinese）］
Thireau，Isabelle and Hua Linshan．2003．“The Moral Universe of Aggrieved Chinese Workers： Workers’ Appeal to Arbitration Committees and Letters and Visits Offices．”The China Journal 50：83-103．
吴毅．2007．权力—利益的结构之网”与农民群体性利益的表达困境［J］．社会学研究（5）．［Wu Yi．2008．“Nets of the PowerRights Structure” and Dilemma of Peasants’ GroupRights Expression： An analysis of a Gravel Pit Dispute．”Sociological Studies（5）．（in Chinese）］
吴毅．2009．基层官民关系新动向［J］．人民论坛（7）．［Wu Yi．2009．“The New Trend of the Grassroots Relationship between Officers and Mass．”People’s Forum（7）．（in Chinese）］
应星．2001．大河移民上访的故事［M］．北京：三联书店．［Ying Xing〖KG-*9〗．2001．A Story of a Hydroelectric Area in Southwest in China．”Beijing： SDX Joint Publishing Company．］
应星．2004．作为特殊行政救济的信访救济［J］．法学研究（3）．［Ying Xing．2004．“The Remedy of‘Letter and Visit’：A Special Administrative Remedy．”Cass Journal of Law（3）．（in Chinese）］ 
应星．2007．草根动员与农民群体利益的表达机制［J］．社会学研究（2）．［Ying Xing．2007．“Grassroots Mobilization and the Mechanism of Interest Expression of the Peasants Group．”Sociological Studies（2）．（in Chinese）］
于建嵘．2000．利益、权威和秩序——对村民对抗基层党政群体性事件的分析［J］．中国农村观察（4）．［Yu Jianrong．2003．“The Mail Reasons of the Mass Incident in Rural China at the Present Stage．”China Rural Survey（4）．（in Chinese）］
于建嵘．2004a．当前农民维权抗争活动的一个解释框架［J］．社会学研究（2）．［Yu Jianrong．2004a．“One Interpreting Framework of Rural Migrants’ Right Protection Activities．”Sociological Studies（2）．（in Chinese）］
于建嵘．2004b．信访的制度性缺失及其政治后果［J］．凤凰周刊（32）．［Yu Jianrong． 2004b．“Institutional Lack of Letter and Visit and Political Consequence．”Phoenix Weekly（32）．（in Chinese）］
于建嵘．农民土地维权抗争的调查［N］．中国经济时报．2005-06-21．［Yu Jianrong．2005． “The Survey on the Peasant’s Land Right Protection Resistance．”China Economic Times 2005-06-21．（in Chinese）］
翟学伟．2004．中国社会中的日常权威［M］．北京：社会科学文献出版社．［Zhai Xuewei．2004．Everyday Charisma in Chinese Society．Beijing：Social Science Academic Press．］
张泰苏．2009．中国人在行政纠纷中为何偏好信访？［J］．社会学研究（3）．［Zhang Taisu．2009．“Why the Chinese Public Prefer Administrative Petitioning over Litigation．” Sociological Studies（3）．（in Chinese）］
郑欣．2005．乡村政治中的博弈生存［M］．北京：中国社会科学出版社．［Zheng Xin．2005．Game Existence in the Village Politics．Beijing： Chinese Social Science Press．］
周飞舟．2006．从汲取型政权到“悬浮型”政权——税费改革对国家与农民关系之影响［J］．社会学研究（3）．［Zhou Feizhou． 2006． “Rural Fee Reform and the Changing Relationship between State and Peasant．” Sociological Studies（3）．（in Chinese）］
Zweig，David．1989．“Struggling Over Land in China： Peasant Resistance after Collectivization， 1966-1986．”in Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance，edited by Forest Colburn．ME． Sharpe：151-174．

责任编辑：路英浩