社会杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 103-116.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

留下还是离开: 政治社会资本对农民工留城意愿的影响研究

  

  1. 作者1：刘茜 西安交通大学管理学院; 作者2：杜海峰 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院; 作者3：靳小怡 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院; 作者4：崔烨 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院
  • 出版日期:2013-07-20 发布日期:2013-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘茜 西安交通大学管理学院,E-mail：liuqian67520@126.com E-mail:E-mail：liuqian67520@126.com
  • 作者简介:作者1：刘茜 西安交通大学管理学院; 作者2：杜海峰 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院; 作者3：靳小怡 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院; 作者4：崔烨 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院
  • 基金资助:

    本文受到国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目（2012BAI32B06,2012BAI32B07）和国家自然科学基金（71071128）的资助。

Stay or Leave: A Study on the Role of Political Social Capital on Rural-Urban Migrants’ Desire to Settle in the City

  1. Author 1：LIU Qian，School of Management，Xi’an Jiaotong University；Author 2：DU Haifeng，School of Public Policy and Administration，Xi’an Jiaotong University）；Author 3：JIN Xiaoyi，School of Public Policy and Administration，Xi’an Jiaotong University；Author 4：CUI Ye，School of Public Policy and Administration，Xi’an Jiaotong University.
  • Online:2013-07-20 Published:2013-07-20
  • Contact: Author 1：LIU Qian，School of Management，Xi’an Jiaotong University,E-mail：liuqian67520@126.com E-mail:E-mail：liuqian67520@126.com
  • About author:Author 1：LIU Qian，School of Management，Xi’an Jiaotong University；Author 2：DU Haifeng，School of Public Policy and Administration，Xi’an Jiaotong University）；Author 3：JIN Xiaoyi，School of Public Policy and Administration，Xi’an Jiaotong University；Author 4：CUI Ye，School of Public Policy and Administration，Xi’an Jiaotong University.
  • Supported by:

    This paper was supported by the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the 12th FiveYear Plan Period(2012BAI32B06,2012BAI32B07) and the National Science Found (71071128).

PDF

615

摘要： 本文利用2009年“X市外来农民工调查”数据，分析来自不同组织类型的社会资本，尤其是政治社会资本对农民工留城意愿的影响。研究发现，政治社会资本比一般社会资本对农民工留城意愿的影响更大；弱关系型政治社会资本比强关系型政治社会资本对农民工留城意愿的影响更大；强弱关系兼有型政治社会资本比单一型政治社会资本对农民工留城意愿的影响更大。本文比较来自不同组织类型的社会资本，深入分析政治社会资本对农民工留在打工城市的意愿的影响，进一步延续和深入了社会资本对农民工留城意愿影响的研究。

关键词: 留城意愿, 政治社会资本, 农民工

Abstract: Discouraging rural-urban migrants’ roaming across different cities is helpful for them to get integrated with the city where they are working and is also of positive significance to the city in terms of maintaining its skilled occupations and upgrading its industrial sector. Based on the social capital theory, this study compared the differences in the effects of political social capital and other types of general social capital in order to analyze the impacts of the social capital from different types of organizations on ruralurban migrants’ desire to settle in their work locations and to further discuss the influences of the political social capital from different kinds of relationships. This attempt took one step further and was an extension of the existing research on the impact of social capital on rural migrant workers’ intention to stay in the city. The data used in this study came from a 2009 survey of ruralurban migrants in X City, Fujian province, which was carried out by Population and Development Research Institute of Xi’an Jiaotong University. The survey had a sample of 1 507 elements obtained with a loose quota sampling method. With the individual factors, family factors, social and environmental factors, and migrating factors under control, the binary logistic regression analysis yielded the following results: (1) the political social capital positively affected migrants’ desire to settle in the city more powerfully than does the general social capital, (2) compared with the strongrelationshipbased political social capital, the weakrelationshipbased political social capital had a greater positive impact on migrants’ desire to settle in the city, and (3) political social capital from both strong and weak relationships was more powerful than monorelationshipbased political social capital in affecting migrants’ desire to settle in the city. In addition, migrants were found to be more likely to depend on their weakrelationshipbased political social capital for help, thus, having broken the habituated Chinese way of thinking with kinship as its core characterized with “patterned differences” and “discriminated treatments”.

Key words: desire to settle in the city, political social capital, rural-urban migrant workers