社会杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 147-175.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家基层策略行为与社区过程: 基于南苑业主自治的社区故事

  

  1. 黄晓星 中山大学社会学与人类学学院
  • 出版日期:2013-07-20 发布日期:2013-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 黄晓星 中山大学社会学与人类学学院,E-mail：huangxiaoxing@hotmail.com E-mail:huangxiaoxing@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:黄晓星 中山大学社会学与人类学学院
  • 基金资助:

    本研究受到教育部人文社会科学研究项目“基层公共服务协同供给和社会管理网络研究”（13YJC63005）、国家教育体制改革试点项目“推进广州学习型社会建设”（04-119-174）子课题和2012年国家社会科学基金重大招标项目（12&ZD007）的资助

State Strategic Actions at the Grass-Roots Levels and Community Processes: A Community Story of Autonomous Governance by the Owners of Nanyuan

  1. HUANG Xiaoxing，School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University,
  • Online:2013-07-20 Published:2013-07-20
  • Contact: HUANG Xiaoxing，School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University,E-mail：huangxiaoxing@hotmail.com E-mail:huangxiaoxing@hotmail.com
  • About author:HUANG Xiaoxing，School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University,
  • Supported by:

    This research was supported by the project “The Collaborative Supply of Grassroots Public Services and Social Management Network Research” (13YJC63005) of Humanities and Social Science of Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China,and the subproject of the national education system reform pilot project “To Promote the Construction of Learning Society of Guangzhou”( 04-119-174), and the Major Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China(12&ZD007).

PDF

778

摘要： 在转型的社区情境中，国家基层政府的行为是策略性的，社区居民亦陷入了权变的回应过程。文章聚焦于20世纪80年代以来政府行为的不同阶段，从中观的社区形态考察基层政府的不同策略和社区过程。政府干预、释出和旁观调控三种不同类型的行为反映了政府对于社区的态度，社区层次和事件性质是基层政府策略行为的关键自变量。文章运用拓展性个案研究方法，分析了国家在社区的基层策略，以及转型期社区的生成和发展，基层政府行为与社区回应的不同逻辑是社区治理困境的重要根源。

关键词: 基层政府, 策略行为, 社区过程, 合法性嵌入程度, 社区层次

Abstract: In the transitional period, communities in China are in the transformation from being under the sole control of the state to the statemarket dual governance. Here, the independent variable is state strategies. Community residents are reacting to the changes of the controlling powers. Three government strategies, i.e., penetrating and controlling, interacting with the market, and building communities, have been the focus of academic attention. However, most of the studies emphasize only some strategic actions during a specific stage, leading to a complex but fragmented presentation of Chinese communities. This paper focuses on the government actions in different stages since the 1980s, and uses the longitudinal community developmental perspective to examine the relations of the grassroots level government strategies and community processes. With the extended case method, the paper places Nanyuan in the macro context of transition to analyze the state strategies in the basiclevel communities as well as the formation and development of communities. The interaction of different constituents of the government, companies, community organizations and community dwellers, which has structured the dominant community networks, is the focal point of this paper. The governmental differentiated mediating/controlling actions of intervening, withdrawing, or observing reflect the government’s attitude toward the community. The position of the community in the social stratification and the nature of an event are the key variables in determining government strategic actions. An event interacts with the status of the community; the higher its status, the stronger its power to bargain with the government. The inconsistency in government action strategies has resulted in big differences in the initial reactions of the grassroots and the key factor in community common action strategies is the “communality” of the community itself. The relative stability of both behavioral strategies is from their own respective “cultural tool kit”. The difference in the logic of the grassrootslevel government and that of the community reaction is an important source of the dilemma in community governance.

Key words: grass-roots level government, strategic actions, community process, legitimate embeddedness, community status