社会杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 118-139.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

购房:制度变迁下的住房分层与自我选择性流动

毛小平  湖南科技大学法学院   

  • 出版日期:2014-03-20 发布日期:2014-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 毛小平 mxp16281230@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究是国家社科基金重点项目(09ASH001)、教育部人文社会科学研究一般课题项目(11YJC840037)和湖南科技大学博士科研启动基金项目(E51210)的阶段性成果。

House Purchasing: Housing Stratification and SelfSelected Mobility in Institutional Transition

MAO Xiaoping,School of Law,Hunan University of Science and Technology   

  • Online:2014-03-20 Published:2014-03-20
  • Supported by:

    This paper is a phased result of a key project of the National Social Sciences Foundation of China (09ASH001)and MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (11YJC840037),which is also supported by PhD research startup foundation of Hunan University of Science and Technology(E51210).

摘要: 本文基于2010年广州市的千户问卷调查数据,利用内生转换回归模型,发现了住房市场化改革过程中住房分层机制中的自我选择性:在1998年前的体制内,能力强的人倾向于不购房,而在1998年前的体制外和1998年以后,能力强的人倾向于购房。在1998年前的体制内,不购房者如果购房,其住房等级会下降;购房者如果不购房,其住房等级会上升。在1998年前体制外和1998年后,那些人力资本或政治资本高的居民实际购房时,其住房等级会更高;购房者如果不购房,其住房等级会下降。由此可知,权力机制与市场机制是影响住房分层的结构因素,政治资本或人力资本的高低是住房分层的必要条件,而非充分条件。“政治资本或人力资本高的居民住房等级也高”的论断从某种意义上忽视了居民的自我选择过程。

关键词: 购房, 住房分层, 自我选择性

Abstract: The literature on housing stratification has ignored the effect of selfselection on housing stratification when residents face changes in the opportunity structure triggered by the housing reform. An analysis of the data from a questionnaire survey of over 1,000 households conducted in Guangzhou in2010 using the Endogeneity Switching Regression Model found the effect of selfselection in the housing stratification mechanisms during the process of marketoriented reform: Capable people within the state system before 1998 tended not to buy houses, and if they did, their housing class status was actually lowered; capable people outside the state system before 1998 and all capable people after 1998 tended to buy houses, and if they didn’t, their housing class status slipped. That is to say, after 1998, the housing class status of those with human or political capital would rise only if they did purchase houses; if not, their housing class status would not improve significantly. Thus, the study concluded that the power and market mechanisms were the structural factors which influenced housing stratification, and that people’s human and political capitals were necessary but not sufficient conditions for house purchasing. To some extent, the judgment that “the higher a person’s human capital and/or political capital is, the higher his/her housing class status is” ignored the role of the person’s selfselection. Of course, the decision making of whether to purchase a house or not might be a very complex selective process. In order to study the selective function in the process indepth, dynamic data including the buyer’s purchasing behaviors and the end results in different social contexts are needed. Because of the flaws in the real estate market and system, residents’freedom to make purchasing decisions is quite limited. These constraints for the current study were beyond the author’s means to overcome.