社会杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 188-212.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

“从无知到有罪”——福柯论“俄狄浦斯王”中的三重“知识-权力”交织

朱雯琤   

  1. 浙江大学公共管理学院政治学系
  • 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2018-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 朱雯琤 E-mail:wenchengf@zju.edu.cn

“From Ignorance to Guilt”: The Triple Interweaving of Knowledge-Power in Foucault's Analysis of Oedipus the King

ZHU Wencheng   

  1. Department of Political Theories, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University
  • Online:2018-03-20 Published:2018-03-20

摘要:

从福柯对戏剧《俄狄浦斯王》的阐释中可看到他对“知识-权力”框架所做的理论补充。福柯试图去除传统解释中知识和求知欲望之间看似自然的因果链关系,而代之以引入知识与权力的复杂关系,以此阐述现代真理话语系统机制的产生。福柯认为弗洛伊德精神分析学解释的俄狄浦斯确实打破了传统认知,但过分抬高了性欲望的理论地位;俄狄浦斯剧更能反映的,是知识话语中真理的发生以及权力机制的运行。在福柯看来,《俄狄浦斯王》不仅体现了自我知识的揭示,还展现了不同类型知识的冲突、权力与知识之间的复杂交织,并且反映了真理审判程序的应用。福柯对《俄狄浦斯王》的分析视角,也喻示着他从具体权力机构考察到古典时期诸权力思想研究的转变。

关键词: 权力, 俄狄浦斯, 真理, 福柯, 知识

Abstract:

The thematic relationship between knowledge and power is of great importance through the whole of Foucault's theoretical thought. Thus his interpretation of the Greek tragedy Oedipus the King should not be neglected, because it can be treated as a supplement to his early writing on this "knowledge-power" relationship. In his analysis of Oedipus the King, Foucault introduces the concept of will to know. Through that concept, he attempts to replace the traditional causal chain, which is prima facie natural, between knowledge and the will to know, with a more complicated relationship between knowledge and power so as to account for the birth of modern systematized institutions of true discourse. Foucault's begins his own interpretation with a critique of Freud. He argues that, though Freud's psychological interpretation of Oedipus the King breaks off the traditional understanding of universal form of desire, it has overvalued the status of sexuality in human culture. On the contrary, what Oedipus the King exactly shows, according to Foucault, is the manifestation of truth and the operation of power institutions in discursive knowledge. Foucault establishes his "Oedipal Knowledge" in three levels. On the first level, the Oedipus fable reveals how some certain types of self-knowledge come into being, and how these different types of knowledge confront each other and finally fit together. On the second level, the Oedipus complex is not about sex, but the complicated interweaving of power-knowledge relation linked with Oedipus's identity:he is both at the same time a king, a criminal and incestuous. On the third and the last, the fable manifests a particular kind of juridical form of truth which originated in ancient times, and figures out how this juridical form of knowledge operates in the modern. Finally, I argue that Foucault's multi-level analysis of Oedipus the King suggests a transition of his research interest, which shifts from investigations of specific institutions of power to ancient thoughts on power.

Key words: Foucault, Oedipus the King, knowledge, power, truth