社会杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 199-225.

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

组织的网络形式研究：综述与展望

李国武  中央财经大学社会学系   

  1. 李国武  中央财经大学社会学系
  • 出版日期:2010-05-25 发布日期:2010-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 李国武 中央财经大学社会学系 E-mail:E-mail： leeguowu@126．com
  • 基金资助:

    本文是教育部人文社会科学研究2006年度一般项目“产业集群中企业间合作关系的形成、持续和解体研究”（06JC840006）的阶段性成果，感谢资助。

Research on Organizations’ Network Forms： Reviews and Prospects

Li Guowu，Sociology Department， Central University of Finance and Economics   

  1. Li Guowu，Sociology Department， Central University of Finance and Economics
  • Online:2010-05-25 Published:2010-05-25
  • Contact: Li Guowu，Sociology Department， Central University of Finance and Economics E-mail:E-mail： leeguowu@126．com
  • Supported by:

    Project suppoted by Ministry of Education 2006 Humanities and Social Sciences Fund（06JC840006）

PDF

812

摘要：


摘要：本文是对近二三十年来国外关于组织的网络形式的实证研究成果的一项选择性综述。组织的网络形式是一种不同于市场和等级制的组织形式，社会学家们特别强调信任、互惠等在其中的作用。对于企业而言，进入特定的组织网络形式有利于促进学习和创新、提高合法性和地位、增进经济收益，这也是组织间结成关系网络的主要原因。已有研究多从制度主义、资源依赖、社会网络和交易成本等角度，探讨国家制度环境、产业属性、企业特征、社会结构和网络位置、交易特征等因素对组织网络形式形成的影响。作者认为，今后需要在网络组织的演化和绩效、不同网络组织类型的差异以及理论视角的融合等三个方面深化研究。

关键词: 组织的网络形式 ,   资源依赖 ,   社会网络  , 实证研究

Abstract:

Abstract： This paper provides a review of selected empirical studies about organizations’ network forms in other countries during the recent couple of decades． Organizational networks represent an organizational form that differs from those that are based on market and rank hierarchy． The roles of trust and reciprocity within such networks are particularly emphasized by sociologists． To a firm， entering a specific network helps promote learning and innovation， enhance its legitimacy and status， and reap economic gains． And those are also the important reasons for organizations connecting with one another． Academic scholars have discussed how a nation’s institutional context， industrial properties， firm attributes， social structural and network position， and trading characteristics affect the formation of organizational networks from perspectives of institutionalism， resource dependence， social network and transactional costs， respectively． The author contends that future studies should pay more attention to the evolution and performance of interorganizational networks， the variations between different organizational network types， and the integration of different theoretical perspectives． Furthermore， empirical studies on the interorganizational networks in China need to be strengthened．

Key words: network forms of organization ,  resource dependence ,  social network ,  positive research