社会杂志

• 文化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

资本下乡与山林流转——来自湖北S镇的经验

郭亮 华中科技大学法学院 中国乡村治理研究中心.   

  1. 郭亮 华中科技大学法学院 中国乡村治理研究中心 .
  • 出版日期:2011-05-20 发布日期:2011-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭亮 华中科技大学法学院 中国乡村治理研究中心 . E-mail:guoliang2002002@sina.com
  • 作者简介:郭亮 华中科技大学法学院 中国乡村治理研究中心
  • 基金资助:

    本文是2009年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“社会变迁视角下当代中国农村土地制度研究”(09YJA840007)及华中科技大学自主创新研究基金重点项目“20世纪以来中国农地制度变迁与发展的历史社会学分析”(W2009003)的阶段性成果.

Capital Resources to the Countryside and the Flow within the Forestry：The Field Experience of Town S in Hubei Province

Guo Liang, School of Law of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Research Center for Rural China Governance.
   

  1. Guo Liang, School of Law of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Research Center for Rural China Governance.
  • Online:2011-05-20 Published:2011-05-20
  • Contact: Guo Liang, School of Law of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Research Center for Rural China Governance. E-mail:guoliang2002002@sina.com
  • About author:Guo Liang, School of Law of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Research Center for Rural China Governance. 
  • Supported by:

    This thesis is the phased subjects of “The Study on Contemporary Land System in China”(09YJA840007), which granted by Humanities and Social Science Research Item of Ministry of Education, and of the “Analysis on the Changes and Development of Land System since 20th with the Method of the Historical Sociology”(W2009003), which granted by Innovation Fund of Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

PDF

865

摘要：

伴随着林权改革的进一步深化，当前，牟利性资本正在大规模地进入山林开发领域，这正迎合了乡镇政府招商引资的需要，由此形成了山林流转的初始动力。在流转过程中，资本充分利用了乡村社会中的非正式资源和正式资源，从而使得流转的效率大为提高。虽然，从表面上看，流转是基于农户的自愿原则，但深入的实证研究可以发现，流转的发生大多是被动员、被操纵的结果，因而造成了程序正义与实质不平等的矛盾。由于基层社会的权力关系对权利形态的塑造，产权建设的孤军深入无法保障农户的实质利益。从某种意义上说，农户土地收益的增加不仅要有新的“权利束”的出现，同时关键还在于这种新的产权合约与其所嵌入于其中的政治环境之间能够相互协调。

关键词: 山林流转, 产权, 资本

Abstract:

With further reform of the ownership of forests, profitaimed capital resources are being invested in opening up forestry on a large scale, which meets the business needs of the local governments. All of this started the initial momentum of the flow within the forestry. In the process, both informal and formal resources in the rural society have been fully utilized, thus stimulating the efficiency of the flow. On the surface, the flow is based on the voluntary principle, but indepth empirical studies have discovered that the flow momentum has been launched on the basis of farmers being mobilized and pushed, thus resulting in a conflict between rightness in operations and inequality in actuality. Due to the shaping power of the local society’s power connections over the powerprofit structure, the lone force to establish property ownership will not be capable of protecting farmers’ actual interests. In a sense, farmers’ increase in their land revenues depends not only on the new category of rights but also on the coordination between the new contract of property rights and the political environment that embeds it.

Key words: flow within forestry, property ownership， capital resources