社会杂志

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

参军:制度变迁下的社会分层与个体选择性流动

汪建华 清华大学人文社会科学学院社会学系.
   

  1. 汪建华 清华大学人文社会科学学院社会学系.
  • 出版日期:2011-05-20 发布日期:2011-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 汪建华 清华大学人文社会科学学院社会学系. E-mail:wjhmcg@163.com
  • 作者简介:汪建华 清华大学人文社会科学学院社会学系(Author: Wang Jianhua, Department of Sociology, School of Humanities and Social Science,Tsinghua University)〓Email:  

Enlistment: Social Stratification and Individual Mobility of  Choice in the Institutional Transition

Wang Jianhua, Department of Sociology, School of Humanities and Social Science,Tsinghua University.   

  1. Wang Jianhua, Department of Sociology, School of Humanities and Social Science,Tsinghua University.
  • Online:2011-05-20 Published:2011-05-20
  • Contact: Wang Jianhua, Department of Sociology, School of Humanities and Social Science,Tsinghua University. E-mail:wjhmcg@163.com
  • About author:汪建华 清华大学人文社会科学学院社会学系(Author: Wang Jianhua, Department of Sociology, School of Humanities and Social Science,Tsinghua University)〓Email: wjhmcg@163.com 

摘要:

国家制度变迁不仅带来社会分层机制的变化,也促使个体对流动机会做出主动选择,因此,地位获得模式不能仅考虑分层机制而忽略微观个体选择性流动的影响。基于CGSS2006数据,本文对参军问题的分析支持了这种观点。研究发现,参军作为政治忠诚的体现,对个体的回报在改革后有较大下降;不同时期参军地位获得模式体现着社会分层机制的变化和对参军回报审视后个体选择性流动的共同作用;当参军能带来较高回报时,参军资源在不同地位群体间体现出更大的不平等。〖JP2〗最后,在参军期间的地位获得上,由于权力的屏蔽效应,个体选择性流动使得此时的地位获得出现了与一般模式截然相反的趋势,即农村青年和体力劳动者的子女反而有更高的入党比例。〖JP〗

关键词: 参军, 制度变迁, 选择性流动, 社会分层

Abstract:

The state’s institutional transition has not only brought about changes in the social stratification mechanism but also stimulated individuals to actively make choices for mobility. Therefore, the model of status attainment should not consider the stratification mechanism only and ignore the impact from the individual mobility of choice at the micro level. The analysis of the enlistment data from the CGSS2006 survey reported in this paper has supported this view. The reward of enlistment as a manifest of political loyalty has greatly decreased during the postreform era. The modes to attain soldier statuses in different periods embodied the combined effects of the changing social stratification mechanisms and the individual mobility of choice after examining the reward of the military service. When the military service could bring in a higher reward, the distribution of this resource showed a higher level of inequality across different strata. Lastly, in the status attainment during the military service, because of the effects of the power being shielded, the individually selected mobility changed the direction in status attainment to the opposite, i.e., it was the rural youth and the children of the manual workers that had a higher probability to become Communist Party members.

Key words: enlistment, institutional transition, selective mobility, social stratification