社会杂志

• 文化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨越国家赋予的权利？——对广州市业主抗争的个案研究

庄文嘉 香港中文大学政治与公共行政学系.   

  1. 庄文嘉 香港中文大学政治与公共行政学系.
  • 出版日期:2011-05-20 发布日期:2011-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 庄文嘉 香港中文大学政治与公共行政学系 E-mail: wjzhuang@cuhk.edu.hk
  • 作者简介:庄文嘉 香港中文大学政治与公共行政学系
  • 基金资助:

    本文受中山大学“211工程”三期“行政改革与政府治理研究项目

Beyond StateConferred Rights? A Case Study on Homeowners’ Confrontation in Guangzhou〖JP〗

Zhuang Wenjia，Department of Government and Public Administration，The Chinese University of Hong Kong.   

  1. Zhuang Wenjia，Department of Government and Public Administration，The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • Online:2011-05-20 Published:2011-05-20
  • Contact: Zhuang Wenjia，Department of Government and Public Administration，The Chinese University of Hong Kong. E-mail: wjzhuang@cuhk.edu.hk
  • About author:Zhuang Wenjia，Department of Government and Public Administration，The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • Supported by:

    This article is based on the project sponsored by Sun Yatsen University, “211 Project” of Stage 3: Research Project of Administrative Reform and Governance (130003〖CD*2〗3226301

PDF

818

摘要：

维权实践的屡屡受挫逐渐使广州业主抗争者看到了另一个层面集体诉求的对象——不合理的规则。于是，一方面，对规则制定权威的信任，促使他们改变抗争诉求，将反应性的规则执行参与行动转换为进取性的规则制定参与行动。另一方面，“有组织抗争”增进了跨小区层面的业主团结和相互信任感，将原本没有直接利益关联的业主个人的微观社会资本转换成为组织的宏观社会资本。不过，为了避免被指责为与当地政府作对，抗争者在建构抗争话语和策略时不得不向国家靠拢，使得国家支配性的政治话语和国家赋权的一元性制度安排融入了动员结构进而规制了抗争行动。结果，业主们提出的进取性诉求，不过是倚仗高阶规则之权威要求低阶规则制定者兑现国家既已赋予的权利而已。

关键词: 业主抗争, 权利意识, 社会资本, 社会运动, 中产阶级

Abstract:

After years of setbacks in defending their house property rights, the homeowners in Guangzhou have begun to see another facet for collective demandunfair rules as the target. On the one hand, their trust in the rulemaking authority has redirected their confrontational demand from taking a reactive action in execution and participation to an active action in rule making. On the other hand, organized confrontation has promoted the mutual trust and solidarity among the owners across residential districts, having transformed the microlevel social capital of those whose interest are not directly related toward macrolevel social capital of the organization. 

Key words: homeowners’ confrontation, rights consciousness, social capital, social movement, middle class