“自我的道德地形学”——一个具有心理学和社会学意涵的本体诠释学理论

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在当今中国，社会学、心理学研究领域中所强调的“文化自觉”的旨趣在于凸显文化主体性以及文化间的和平沟通。“自我的道德地形学”无疑对这一旨趣具有独特的理论启示意义，它构成了C.泰勒的巨著《自我的根源》的主体部分，并在其诠释学思想中占有基础地位。“自我的道德地形学”首先是作为一个心理学理论被提出来的，而它的社会学意涵在以其为基础的、C.泰勒的著名政治理论论文“承认的政治”中充分地得以展现。鉴于这一理论以兼具心理学和社会学意涵的本体论诠释为基础，对错综复杂的历史经验具有条分缕析的阐释力，因此，作者认为，对该理论所具有的启示意义予以深刻地把握，对中国社会学、心理学在方兴未文的跨学科文化研究领域建构基础性的平台具有重要意义。

关键词: 自我（的道德）地形学 , 承认的政治 , 自我探索 , 差异政治

Abstract:

The introduction and application of hermeneutics by contemporary Chinese scholars mainly focus on the fields of philosophy, theology, law, and literary theory, while the psychological and sociological implications of this approach are often neglected. “The moral topography of the self” by CharlesTaylor, a representative of the hermeneutical approach in contemporary social theories, will correct the bias. The “topography” leads to the main parts of Taylor’s great book Sources of the Self, and occupies a basic position in his hermeneutical thoughts. Earlier than Sources of the Self, this theory was first published in a collection about the relationships between hermeneutics and psychological theories. Its sociological implications were demonstrated in Taylor’s famous political theoretical paper The Politics of Recognition, which took it as its theoretical basis. In this writing, Taylorabsorbed and revised the classical psychological and sociological thoughts of Freud, Weber, and Durkheim, turning the “topography” into an ontological hermeneutical theory with the power of interpreting complicated historical experiences in a clear way. This theory has extraordinary significance to the “cultural selfawareness” of Chinese Sociology and Psychology, because it can strongly stimulate the interest of “cultural selfawareness” in empirical studies, that is, to highlight the cultural subjectivity and communicate peacefully between cultures. Both psychology and sociology embedded in culture have integrative perspectives which make these two sciences being recognized as the fundamental disciplines of humanity and social sciences. And between the two, sociology is more outstanding in its integrative power. Taylor’s discussion of “the moral topography of the self” originates from psychological issues but concludes with strong sociological implications. This way of thinking and its framework are helpful to psychology and sociology, the latter, in particular. The theory will have its unique effects in the new wave of interdisciplinary cultural studies in China.

Key words: the (moral) topography of the self , the politics of recognition , selfexploration , politics of differenc

徐冰. “自我的道德地形学”——一个具有心理学和社会学意涵的本体诠释学理论[J]. 社会杂志.

XU Bing. “The Moral Topography of the Self”：An Ontological Hermeneutical Theory with Psychological and Sociological Implications[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology.

参考文献

参考文献（References）
Abbey, Ruth. 2000. Charles Taylor. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Cooke, Maeve. 1997. “Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas and the Politics of Recognition.” Political Theory, vol.25(2).
Durkheim, Emile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.
涂尔干，E. ［1914］2006. 人性的两重性及其社会条件［G］//乱伦禁忌及其起源. 汲喆、付德根、渠东，译. 上海人民出版社.［Durkheim, Emile.（1914）2006.“Le Dualisme de la Nature Humaine et ses Conditions Socales.”In La Prohibition de l’Inceste et Ses Origines，translated by Ji Ji，Fu Degen， and Qu Dong. Shanghai People’s Publishing House.］
费孝通.1985. 乡土中国生育制度［M］. 北京大学出版社.［Fei Xiaotong. 1985. Earthbound China Reproductive System. Beijing： Peking University Press.］
费孝通.1999. 费孝通文集（第五卷 1947-1948）［M］.北京：群言出版社.［Fei Xiaotong. 1999. The Collection of Fei Xiaotong (V 1947-1948). Beijing: Qunyan Press.］
费孝通. 2003. 试谈扩展社会学的传统界限［J］. 新华文摘（3）.［Fei Xiaotong. 2003. “On the Expanding the Traditional Boundary of Sociology.” Xinhua Digest (3). (in Chinese)］.
弗洛伊德，S. 1999. 释梦［M］. 孙名之，译. 北京：商务印书馆. ［Freud, S. 1999. The Interpretation of Dreams，translated by Sun Mingzhi. Beijing: The Commercial Press.］
加达默尔，汉斯-格奥尔格. ［1960］［1986］2004. 真理与方法（上卷）［M］. 洪汉鼎，译. 上海译文出版社. ［Gadamer, H. G. （1960）（1986）2004. Truth and Method (I)，translated by Hong Handing. Shanghai Translation Publishing House.］
加达默尔，汉斯-格奥尔格.［1976］2004.哲学解释学［M］. 洪汉鼎，译.上海译文出版社.［Gadamer, H. G. （1976）2004.Philosophical Hermeneutics，translated by Hong Handing. Shanghai Translation Publishing House.］
甘阳. 2002. 将错就错［M］. 北京：三联书店.［Gan Yang. 2002. Continuing the Mistakes. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.］
Giddens, Anthony. 1992. Modernity and SelfIdentity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1993. “Struggle for recognition in constitutional states.” European Philosophy, 2.
流心. 2005. 自我的他性：当代中国的自我谱系［M］. 常姝，译.上海人民出版社.［Liu Xin. 1987. The Otherness of Self, translated by Chang Zhu. Shanghai People’s Publishing House.］
Maddi, Salvatore. 1988. “Is the Move to Modernity So Simple?” In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, Psychopathology, edited by Stanley B. Messer, Louis A. Sass, and Robert L. Woolfolk London: Rutgers University.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
利科，P. 1987. 解释学与人文科学［M］.陶远华，等，译. 石家庄：河北人民出版社.［Ricoeur, P. 1987. Hermeneutics and Human Sciences, translated by Tao Yuanhua, et al. Shijiazhuang: Hebei People’s Publishing House.］
Sass, Louis. 1988. “The Self in Contemporary Psychoanalysis: Commentary on Charles Taylor.” In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, Psychopathology, edited by Stanley B. Messer, Louis A. Sass, and Robert L. Woolfolk London: Rutgers University.
Smith, Nicholas. 2002. Charles Taylor: Meaning, Morals and Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1964. The Explanation of Behaviour. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Taylor, Charles. 1985a. “Peaceful Conexistence in Psychology.” In Charles Taylor. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers I. Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles.1985b, “Foucault on Freedom and Truth.” In Charles Taylor. Philosophy and Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers II. Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles.1985c. “What is Human Agency?” In Charles Taylor. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers I. Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1985c. “Introduction.” In Charles Taylor. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers I. Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1988a. “The Moral Topography of the Self.” In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, Psychopathology, edited by Stanley B. Messer, Louis A. Sass, and Robert L. Woolfolk London: Rutgers University.
Taylor, Charles. 1988b. “Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and the Question of the ‘Inner’: Commentary on Kenneth Gergen.” In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, and Psychopathology, edited by Stanley B. Messer, Louis A. Sass, and Robert L. Woolfolk London: Rutgers University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: the Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University.
泰勒，C. ［1991］2001. 现代性之隐忧［M］. 陈炼，译. 北京：中央编译出版社.［Taylor, C. 2001. The Malaise of Modernity, translated by Chen Lian. Beijing: Central Complication & Translation Press.］
Taylor, Charles. 1992a. “Inwardness and Culture for Modernity.” In Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, edited by A. Honnath, T. McCarty, C. Offe and A. Wellmer Cambridge, Mass: M. T. Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1992b. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
泰勒，C. ［1994］1997. 承认的政治［G］∥身份认同与公共文化. 陈清桥，编. 香港：牛津大学出版社.［Taylor, C. 1997. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Identity and Public Culture, edited by Chen Qingqiao. Hongkong: Oxford University Press.］
Taylor, Charles.1995. “CrossPurpose: The LiberalCommunitarian Debate.” In Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University Press.
Taylor, Charles.2002. Varieties of Religion Today. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham and Landon: Duke University.
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Harvard University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 2010. “Afterword: Apologia pro Libro suo.” In Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age, edited by Michael Warner, Jonathan VanAntwerpen and Craig Calhoun. Harvard University Press.
Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences, translated by Edward Shils and Henry Finch. New York: Free Press.
Weber, Max.1978. Economy and Society, translated by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich (eds.). Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
徐冰. 2007. 社会科学方法论脉络中的诠释学进路［J］. 社会理论（3）.［Xu Bing. 2007. “The Hermeneutical Approach in the Methodological Context of the Social Sciences.” Social Theory (3). (in Chinese)］
徐冰. 2010. 文化心理学：跨学科的探索［J］. 社会心理学研究(3).［Xu Bing. 2010. “Cultural Psychology: The interdisciplinary explorations.” Journal of Social Psychology (3). (in Chinese)］
徐冰. 2012. “经验研究”与“理论研究”——古典社会学、心理学的诠释学意涵［J］. 社会学研究（1）.［Xu Bing.2012. “‘The Empirical Studies’ and ‘the Theoretical Studies’—The Hermeneutical Implications of Classic Sociology and Psychology.” Sociological Studies (1). (in Chinese)］
杨国枢. 1993. 我们为什么要建立中国人的本土心理学？［J］本土心理学研究（1）.［Yang Guoshu. 1993. “Why will we establish Chinese Indigenous Psychology?” Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies (1). (in Chinese).］
应星、吴飞、赵晓力、沈原. 2006. 重新认识中国社会学的思想传统［J］. 社会学研究（4）.［Ying Xing, Wu Fei, Zhao Xiaoli, and Shen Yuan. 2006. “Reunderstanding the Thoughts Tradition of Chinese Sociology.” Sociological Studies (4). (in Chinese)］
余英时，2005. 现代危机与思想人物［M］. 北京：三联出书店.［Yu Yingshi. 2005. The Modern Crisis and the Thoughers. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.］

责任编辑：路英浩