社会杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1-28.

• 论文 •    下一篇

公民身份认同：一个新研究领域的形成理路

郭台辉    

  1. 华南师范大学政治与行政学院
  • 出版日期:2013-09-20 发布日期:2013-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭台辉 E-mail:zhxhgth@126．com E-mail:E-mail:zhxhgth@126．com
  • 作者简介:郭台辉 华南师范大学政治与行政学院
  • 基金资助:

    国家社科基金项目（11CZZ004）及2012年度国家社科基金重大项目（第二批）的阶段性成果。

Citizenship Identity: The Theoretical Development of a New Research Field

GUO Taihui   

  1. School of Politics and Administration， South China Normal University
  • Online:2013-09-20 Published:2013-09-20
  • Contact: GUO Taihui E-mail:zhxhgth@126．com E-mail:E-mail:zhxhgth@126．com
  • About author:GUO Taihui School of Politics and Administration， South China Normal University
  • Supported by:

    This is one of the Phased Results of National Funting of Social Science (11CZZ004) and National Important Project of Social Science in 2012 (Second time).

PDF

599

摘要： 公民身份的认同问题是20世纪90年代以后由公民身份研究与认同研究结合而被推动起来的，是亚民族的地方认同与超民族的区域认同汇合到政治层面得以表达的结果，对西方民族国家建构的现代公民身份及其认同形态都产生很大冲击。公民身份与认同既相矛盾又可部分融合；公民身份认同主要关注个体或群体对政治共同体之成员地位（包括自我安全、归属、团结、包容或排斥）的心理认知和主观感受，在于提升政治共同体之成员的尊严和地位。公民身份认同研究从外部可以划分为宪政爱国主义、多元主义、激进民主主义这三种理论视角与政治主张，从内部可以划分为合法化构建的、拒斥性的、重新规划的公民身份认同三种类型。本文立足于20世纪90年代以来西方社会政治理论的主要文献，旨在厘清公民身份与认同两议题的结合过程，阐释据于公民身份认同的不同理论旨趣，探讨其内在的分形结构。公民身份认同研究正日益受到学术界的高度关注，其内部分形在现实上正挑战着现代公民身份的单一认同结构。
关键词：公民身份认同公民身份认同合法化构建的拒斥性的重新规划的

关键词: 公民身份, 认同, 公民身份认同, 合法化构建的, 拒斥性的, 重新规划的

Abstract: Citizenship identity is a research field that has developed from a partial merge of lines of studies on citizenship and identity, a result of expressing the subethnic local identity and the beyondethnic regional identity at the political level. This has greatly pushed the emergence and construction of modern citizenship and different forms of its identity in Western countries. In this field with two cores, citizenship and identity are opposed to each other yet they are partially integrated. As a new field resulting from the intersection of the two, research on citizenship identity is focused on individuals’ or groups’ psychological cognition and phenomenological experience of their membership in political communities (selfsafety, belongingness, solidarity and inclusion/exclusion) with a wish to promote the sense of dignity and status as members in a political community. Examined externally, research on citizenship identity in the Western academia has centered around three sociopolitical schools of thought, namely, constitutional patriotism, pluralism, and radical democratism. Researchers of each school, respectively, have worked out relatively coherent political views. Examined internally, research on citizenship identity has branched out into three lines, namely, legitimating construction, rejecting, and reconstructing, each of which, independently, is concerned with the power construction in modern citizenship identity, challenges from religions and local cultures in the age of globalization, and new issues coming with the citizenship of the European Union. This paper, based on the literature of the sociopolitical theories in the West since the 1990s, reviews the processes through which the two topics of citizenship and identity have come together, illustrates different theoretical discussions of citizenship identity and its internally differentiated aspects. Citizenship identity, as a new research field, is gaining high attention in the academia. The internal differentiation of citizenship identity is challenging the conception of a single homogeneous identity structure in regards to modern citizenship identity.

Key words: citizenship, citizenship identity, identity, legitimately constructed, reconstructed, rejecting