社会杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 30-58.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

脱耦中的合法性动员——对南方某大学孵化器的扎根理论分析

  

  1. 作者1:王程韡,清华大学科学技术与社会研究所; 作者2:王路昊,清华大学科学技术与社会研究所
  • 出版日期:2013-11-20 发布日期:2013-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 王程韡 E-mail:chengwei.thu@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究得到国家自然科学基金项目“政策学习、政策试验与政策创新:基于二维多源流演化模型的理论与实证”(71103105)和清华大学文化传承创新基金项目“科技与社会相互建构的机制和问题研究:中国案例与国际比较”(2012WHYX007)的资助。


Legitimacy Mobilization in Decoupling: A Grounded Theory Analysis of a University Incubator in Southern China

  1. Author 1: WANG Chengwei, Institute of Science, Technology and Society, Tsinghua University; Author 2: WANG Luhao, Institute of Science, Technology and Society, Tsinghua University
  • Online:2013-11-20 Published:2013-11-20
  • Contact: WANG Chengwei E-mail:chengwei.thu@gmail.com
  • Supported by:

    This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China “Policy Learning, Policy Experimentation, and Policy Innovation: Theoretical and Empirical Studies Basing on a 2D Multiple Streams Evolutionary Model”(71103105) and Tsinghua University Cultural Inheritance and Innovation Program “The Mutual Construction Mechanisms and Issues on Science, Technology, and Society: Case and Comparative Studies in China”(2012WHYX007).

摘要: 脱耦与合法性重建是组织社会学研究的核心和中国科技孵化器建设事业的重点。已有研究对组织特性和可利用的社会、文化资源的强调,并不能完满地解释中国大学孵化器脱耦中的合法性动员机制。本文通过对南方某成功运作的大学孵化器的扎根理论分析发现,当面对强大的环境神话压力时,无法实现经济效率的初创期组织必须首先完成合法性重建,才能进行正式的制度化。该孵化器成功的关键在于,首先移植已形成特殊信任的校友网络实现道义合法性,再进一步抓住现实机遇,借助项目的成功实现实用合法性。唯一权威领导的塑造和“四不像”模糊制度理念的宣导等都是重建中重要的意义建构的部分,这也离不开与更大的制度场域的重新耦合。

关键词: 脱耦 , 合法性 , 重新耦合 , 大学孵化器 , 扎根理论

Abstract: Decoupling from the institutional myth and reconstructing legitimacy are two central issues in organizational sociology studies as well as the main focus in the incubator development in science and technology in China. Existing research that emphasizes the functional feature of organizations themselves and the availability of social and cultural recourses, however, cannot explain well how Chinese university incubators can decouple from the institutional environment that has been called a “liner model” of innovation without any legitimacy imbalance. This study applied grounded theory analysis to a successful university incubator in Southern China and found that, when confronting the tremendous pressure from the myths of the institutional environment and experiencing failure to achieve the economic efficiency during the early stage, an organization had to first complete legitimation before formal institutional construction. The success of this incubator was primarily due to the achievement of the moral legitimacy for the existing alumni network that had already generated unique trust and then the establishment of the pragmaticlegitimacy by taking opportunities to get multiple projects effectively completed. Creating the image of the sole leader with charisma and advocating the obscure idea named “neither fish nor fowl” were the crucial sensemaking parts in the reconstruction process, which was in fact inevitably to recouple with a bigger and broader institutional field. In this sense, legitimacyrebuildingtook place both internally and externally. We confirmed that, in addition to the very important role of the charismatic leader in legitimacy mobilization as other studies on Chinese society had observed,  more attention should be given to other mediators, especially the nonhuman actors (actants), since not only can they block the pressure from the myths of the external institutional environment to just allow the needed legitimate resources filtered in but also provide freedom for actors to work creatively internally without the danger of defocusing. This is exactly what Scandinavian institutionalism is calling for research.

Key words: decoupling ,  , legitimacy ,  recoupling ,  university incubator , grounded theory