社会杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 165-192.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国农村家庭演变:“核心化”还是“个体化”?——以私房钱的道德评价为切入点

邢朝国   

  1. 北京科技大学社会学系,中国人民大学社会学理论与方法研究中心
  • 出版日期:2017-09-20 发布日期:2017-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 邢朝国 E-mail:xingchaoguo@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究得到教育部人文社科重点基地重大课题(16JJD840014)和中央高校基本科研业务费(FRF-BR-16-006B)支持。

How Chinese Rural Family Changes:Nucleating or Individualizing? An Analysis Based on Moral Evaluation of Private Savings

XING Chaoguo   

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Science and Technology Beijing;Center for Studies of Sociological Theory & Method of Renmin University
  • Online:2017-09-20 Published:2017-09-20
  • Supported by:

    The research was supported by Major Project of MOE Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences (16JJD840014) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (FRF-BR-16-006B).

摘要:

当前中国家庭研究范式出现了从"家族主义"到"个体家庭"的转变,在此背景下,本文从家庭经济生活角度切入,通过勾勒农村居民评价私房钱的道德框架,讨论中国农村家庭仍然是在"核心化"轨迹上还是走向了"个体化"。研究发现,私房钱的来源、数额及用途,家庭经济控制情况和亲密关系状况是村民评价私房钱道德与否的重要因素。这些因素都被包含在"个体/家庭"框架下,其中是否影响核心家庭的财产安全和生计安全构成私房钱道德评价的核心标准。研究认为,中国农村家庭的发展轨迹仍然是"核心化"而非"个体化"。

关键词: 个体化, 私房钱, 道德评价, 核心化, 中国农村家庭

Abstract:

Ifamily is a new paradigm for explaining Chinese family changes, which is obviously different from "Familism".In such background, the paper tries to discuss the direction of Chinese rural family's change from family economy life, and namely how peasants evaluate private savings. The paper assumes that peasants evaluate private savings either from individual perspective or from family perspective. Based on field work conducted in a village by the North shore of the Yangtze River within the territory of Anhui Province, the results show that private savings' source, amount and use are factors which affect peasants' judgment. In addition, the state of family financial control and intimate relationship also affect their appraisement. Specifically, money obtained by luck and money saved in daily life is more likely to be accepted. Small amount private savings is more likely to be accepted. Private savings for subsistence and emergency is more likely to acquire good appraise than private savings for luxurious. Private savings used inside family and for family are more likely to be accepted than private savings used outside family and for personal affairs. People are more likely to accept private savings hided by people who are financially controlled or in bad intimate relationship. These factors are included in binary framework "individual vs. family", and nuclear family's property safety and livelihood safety are the core evaluation criterions for judging private savings.Therefore, the paper holds that the change of Chinese rural family is still nucleating not individualizing.

Key words: individualizing, private savings, moral evaluation, nucleating, Chinese rural family