社会杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 170-202.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

佛寺与家庙:滇西土官仪式的重构

连瑞枝   

  1. 台湾交通大学人文社科系暨族文所
  • 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 连瑞枝 E-mail:sophie0502@gmail.com

Buddhist Temples and Ancestral Halls: The Reconstruction of Tusi's Ritual in Western Yunnan

LIAN Ruizhi   

  1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Graduate Program of Ethnicity and Culture, Chao Tung University
  • Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-05-20

摘要:

明代中央王朝以违背伦理与礼仪原则为由废除西南土官。正统年间,革除鹤庆土官,改派流官。官员将佛寺改建为庙学,打击活佛信仰,士人也莫不以毁淫祀、诫僭越之名倡议正统祀典。此时,邻近土官开始谨慎处理身份与仪式的政治问题,并在经学传统中寻找身份、仪式的合法性基础。本文以云南丽江府与蒙化府的两位土官为主要研究对象,讨论他们如何以古代诸侯的身份,致力于建置相应的仪式和祠宇,如:(1)修建家寺、宦祠乃至勋祠与报功祠等;(2)将神话转为符合仪式正统的山川祭祀,成为土官领地的守护神;(3)建立宦谱,以文字书写的方式将氏族神话、传说系谱纳入正统历史叙事,并强化边境土官世系的优越性。通过分析在这一过程中土官的一系列作为,本文探究了土官在维护地方声望与地方利益时所采取的文化策略。

关键词: 土官仪式与历史, 佛寺, 书写家谱, 家庙

Abstract:

In imperial China, abolishing tusi (native official) offices was always justified as retaliation for disobeying the orthodoxy of the Chinese state. For example, in the early Ming period, the Heqing tusi was abolished and the chieftaincy's domain put under imperial official's direct control following such a false accusation. Next, the imperial officials constructed Confucian schools and sought to restrict Buddhist temples and beliefs, and advocated orthodox ritual among the local elite by prohibiting heterodox temples and encouraging them to revise their history. At the same time, some tusi consciously engaged in the work of establish their own proper rituals based on the Canonized Chinese Classics. In this paper, I focus on two cases, the tusis of Lijiang and Monghua, discussing how native officials rebuilt their rituals according to the standards set for the feudal lords of ancient China and utilized three strategies to declare their noble status in the eyes of the Chinese state. The first strategy was building a patrilineal ancestral hall. Second, to strengthen their superiority, they constructed written genealogies which included an origin myth and common ancestor, connecting legendary ancestors to the inherited tusi title. Third, under the feudal political system, they legitimized and promoted Buddhist temples as historical heritage to ensure claims to their territory. In Lijiang tusi's case, the paper explains the making of written genealogy not only confirmed Mu tusi's leading position among tribal society by transcript oral mythical figure into ancestor, but also legitimizing their alliance with Guzhong and Bai politics according to their brotherhood-originated story. At the same time, they built an ancestral hall as a legal institution to claim their status as Chinese ancient feudal lord, which implied they could rule their territory properly. In the other case, Monghua tusi was under maternal alliance's support, tracing their ancestor to Nanchao King. As they became the descendant of ancient king, they renovated ancient Buddhist temples and took over inherited ritual status in the native society. Through these arrangements, we can clearly observe the tusi, as the agent in border area, was able to take advantage of their historical capital to consolidate their local interests.

Key words: written genealogy, Buddhist temple, Tusi's ritual and family history, ancestral hall