社会杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 124-156.

• 社会分层 • 上一篇    下一篇

求助悖论:疾病众筹的社会经济地位差异

程诚1, 任奕飞2   

  1. 1. 东南大学社会学系、医疗健康社会学研究所;
    2. 浙江大学社会学系
  • 发布日期:2022-01-25
  • 作者简介:程诚,E-mail:cheng2020@seu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    本文为东南大学"至善青年学者"支持计划(2242021R40005)的阶段性成果

The Paradox of Seeking Help: Socio-Economic Status Differences in Medical Crowdfunding in the Era of Mobile Internet

CHENG Cheng1, REN Yi fei2   

  1. 1. Department of Sociology, Research Center for Health and Medical Sociology, Southeast University;
    2. Department of Sociology, Zhejiang University
  • Published:2022-01-25
  • Supported by:
    This research is supported by the Zhishan Young Scholar Program of Southeast University

摘要: 依托于移动互联网的疾病众筹平台改变了传统的疾病社会救助体系,疾病救助的发起方从政府和社会公益组织延展至亿万百姓,为社会底层获得紧急救助提供了新途径。本文利用我国某大型疾病众筹平台上1 930个求助案例,探究了疾病众筹目标达成的家庭社会经济地位差异。研究发现,家庭社会经济地位越高的病患,其众筹项目越可能被转发与捐赠、所筹善款总额和目标完成度也更高。中介效应分析表明,线下人际关系网络在上述关系中扮演着重要的中介角色,而以文案质量为代表的文化资本虽有助于众筹成效,但并非连接家庭社会经济地位与众筹效果的中介机制。进一步分析发现,当求助途径从基于熟人关系的微信圈子扩展至公共网络平台后,筹款效果的地位差异得以显著下降。

关键词: 疾病众筹, 健康不平等, 社会资本, 文化资本, 移动互联网

Abstract: In recent years, the emergence of mobile internet-based crowdfunding has provided a new way for the poor to obtain emergency relieves for medical needs. Despite a number of reported scams, medical crowdfunding as a wholes has made an important social contribution to the society. Public opinions and sentiment highlight two practical issues:Are the resources being directed to the people who need the most? And how can we optimize the crowdfunding? To tackle these questions, we focus on the issue of how the socioeconomic status of help seekers affect their internet fundraising outcomes. We ask three research questions:What is the correlation between the socio-economic status of help seekers and their crowdfunding effectiveness? What are the underlying mechanisms for success? Is there a possible optimization path for crowdfunding? Our data is based on the 1 930 fundraising cases from a large medical crowdfunding platform in China. The study finds significant differences in effectiveness among different socio-economic status groups. Higher SES status correlate with higher donation figures, fundraising target completions, a larger number of donations received and more cross-social media platform reposting. This socio-economic gradient phenomenon contradicts the social expectation of prioritizing help to the most needed in medical crowdfunding. The analysis of mediation effect also shows that the offline interpersonal network plays an important intermediary role. While good case narratives are helpful but they are not the intermediary mechanism that links the family's socio-economic status and crowdfunding effect. Further analysis also finds that when fundraising begins with WeChat friends circles and then moves to public platforms, the impact of socioeconomic gradient seems to reduce its significance.

Key words: medical crowdfunding, health inequality, social capital, cultural capital, mobile internet