社会杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 205-240.

• 论文 • 上一篇    

在“生活”与“理想”之间:涂尔干的行动社会学大纲

郑琰   

  • 发布日期:2025-04-29
  • 作者简介:郑琰,河海大学公共管理学院社会学系,E-mail:zhengyan1424@163.com

Between “Life” and “Ideal”: An Outline of Durkheim’s Sociology of Action

ZHENG Yan   

  • Published:2025-04-29

摘要: 本文试图以“生活”和“理想”两个核心概念为主轴,系统勾勒出涂尔干行动社会学的理论大纲。首先,涂尔干社会理论中的行动者及其行动图示既吸纳了普通公民在日常生活中因信仰需要而展开的常规行动,也包含社会学家在危机时刻为重建理想而进行的创造行动。其次,涂尔干认为,这两类行动图示之间不是相互隔绝而是彼此交融的关系,只有通过学者与公众之间的沟通合作与集体行动,社会学才能突破现代性条件之下思考与行动、身体与心灵以及科学与信仰等诸多二元对立的屏障,进而既拓展学者理性主义的思维边界,又将公众的生活需要纳入文明轨道,共同创造出契合时代的神圣理想并实现社会的重建与更新。最后,本文指出,涂尔干对行动问题的思考继承并发扬了法国“政治理性主义”的智识传统,凸显了社会学的政治关怀与知识分子的公共职责,为我们探索如何实践置身时代的社会理论思考提供了“以身载道”的典范。

关键词: 常规行动, 创造行动, 生活与理想, 学者与公民, 社会学的政治关怀

Abstract: This paper attempts to systematically outline Durkheim’s sociology of action with the two core concepts of “life” and “ideal” as the main axis. Firstly, Durkheim’s sociology of action begins with a sociomorphological analysis and a sociopathological diagnosis of the crisis of modernity caused by the separation of thinking and action. He focuses on two major types of actors, namely intellectuals and citizens, as presented in his work Suicide. Secondly, through the analysis of core texts such as Ethics and the Sociology of Morals and The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, the paper points out that Durkheim’s action schema not only absorbs the routine actions carried out by citizens in their daily lives for the needs of their faith, but also includes the creative actions taken by sociologists to rebuild the common ideals in times of crisis. Thirdly, through an examination of Durkheim’s thoughts and actions during the Dreyfus Affair and the World War I, the paper further points out that the two types of actors and their iconography of action sketched by Durkheim are not isolated from each other but rather intertwined together. Only through the common communication and collective action between citizens and intellectuals can sociology break through the barriers of binary opposition between science and belief, thinking and action, body and mind under the conditions of modernity, thus expanding the boundaries of intellectuals’rationalism, while at the same time integrating the public needs into the orbit of civilization, and jointly creating sacred ideals that are appropriate to the times, and realizing the reconstruction and renewal of society. Finally, Durkheim’s reflection on the issue of action inherits and carries forward the intellectual tradition of French “political rationalism”, highlights the political concerns of sociology and the public responsibilities of intellectuals, and provides us with a model of “embodying one’s ideas with one’s actions” on how to think about social theories in our time.

Key words: routine actions, creative actions, life and ideal, intellectuals and citizens, political concerns of sociology