社会杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 114-141.

• 专题三:“关系”研究新探 • 上一篇    下一篇

恩义之间: 行动伦理视角下的师徒关系研究

余朋翰()   

  • 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-10-27
  • 作者简介:余朋翰 中国社会科学杂志社 E-mail: yuph@cass.org.cn

Between Affection and Righteousness: A Study on the Master-Apprentice Relationship from the Perspective of Ethics of Social Actions

Penghan YU()   

  • Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-10-27
  • About author:YU Penghan, Social Sciences in China Press E-mail: yuph@cass.org.cn

摘要:

关于师徒制的既有研究主要聚焦于雇佣劳动属性, 而对于其背后的行动伦理, 亦即中国师徒制特有的"宗法性"特征关注较少。儒家先秦文献将师徒关系的伦理内涵概括为"恩义之间", 认为师徒互动的人格教育目标决定了其"义"的伦理维度, 共同的生活起居以及价值共识基础上的道义互动决定了其"恩"的伦理维度。"恩义之间"的伦理关系在丧礼中呈现为"心丧三年"的致哀方式。虽然中国传统社会中拟家现象所在多有, 但是师徒关系在成文规范里缺少明确标准, 相较于其他社会关系更加灵活。本文通过对古典文献中师徒伦理的梳理发现, 师徒关系的灵活性指向行动者对恩义关系的体认, 这种体认方式在当代中国人际互动中仍然发挥着作用。

关键词: 师徒关系, 宗法性, 丧服, 恩,

Abstract:

Existing research on Chinese apprenticeship system has primarily focused on its characteristics as a form of wage labor, while failing to address the underlying ethics of action-specifically, the distinctive "patriarchal" features inherent to the system. From the perspective of behavioural ethics, the possibility of establishing a master-apprentice relationship lies in the tendency to integrate new social relationships outside the family into existing ethical frameworks. Pre-Qin Confucian literatures encapsulate the ethical essence of master-apprentice bonds as "between affection(En) and righteousness(Yi)": the character-building objectives of their interactions define the ethical dimension of "Yi"; while their shared daily life and moral exchanges grounded in shared values define the ethical dimension of "En". This ethical relationship manifested in mourning rituals through the practice of three-year period of "mourning with the heart".The master-apprentice relationship exhibits remarkable flexibility in China's historical records: on the one hand, while quasi-familial phenomena were commonplace in Chinese society, written norms lacked explicit standards for such a relationship, rendering it exceptionally adaptable compared to other social relations. On the other hand, the master-apprentice relation had appeared intermittently throughout historical records, with its visibility generally correlating with the prominence of Confucian thought movements outside official institutions. This flexibility stem from the subjectivity with which actors perceive bonds of obligation and gratitude. Unlike foundational Confucian relationships such as father-son or monarch-subject, the master-apprentice relationship lacked objectively defined criteria. It was not anchored in clear blood ties or contractual agreements, consequently, the ritual system was incapable of imposing rigid and one-size-fits-all rules. Instead, it preserved a foundation of basic etiquette while allowing actors to express sentiments based on subjective emotions. This dual-dimensional perception of affection(En) and righteousness(Yi) continues to shape contemporary Chinese interpersonal interactions.

Key words: master-apprentice relationship, patriarchal feature, mourning apparel, righteousness(Yi), ethics of social actions