社会杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 142-172.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

马克斯·韦伯"祛魅"概念的两个来源: 一个思想谱系学的考察

郁喆隽()   

  • 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-10-27
  • 作者简介:郁喆隽 复旦大学哲学学院 E-mail: yuzhejun@fudan.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目"后世俗语境下的'祛魅'与'复魅'叙事研究"(23BZJ014)

Two Origins of Max Weber's Concept of "Disenchantment": A Genealogical Examination

Zhejun YU()   

  • Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-10-27
  • About author:YU Zhejun, School of Philosophy, Fudan University E-mail: yuzhejun@fudan.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Social Science Fund "Narratives of Disenchantment and Re-enchantment in the Context of Post-Secularity"(23BZJ014)

摘要:

本文通过词源结合思想谱系学梳理, 尝试总结马克斯·韦伯"祛魅"概念及其相关叙事的两个主要来源——以席勒为代表的德国浪漫主义和以17世纪荷兰神学家巴尔塔萨·贝克尔为代表的反巫术主义。席勒在《希腊的群神》中提出了"祛神"概念, 但他并不是单纯为了复古或反启蒙, 而是希望用神性来改善人性。德国浪漫主义高度关注"巫"(或"魔法"), 提出以"一元论"和审美为路径, 克服机械世界观带来的弊病; 贝克尔的反巫术主义立场则是借用笛卡尔的"二元论"哲学, 在捍卫信仰的前提下论证巫术的无效性。两者都遗留了各自的问题: 德国浪漫主义的审美出路仅可能成为极少数知识分子的出路, 难以触及社会整体, 而其人神同型、同性也无法实现; 贝克尔的反巫术立场则遇到了巫术-宗教关系和人类宗教的普遍历史这两个难题。韦伯在一战期间的写作吸纳了上述两个来源的成果, 也分别回应了两者各自遗留的问题, 完成了问题意识的"闭环": 一方面, 他意识到现代文明中意义的空场, 要求用"天职"来对抗生命的倦怠; 另一方面, 他提出了一个宗教发展的历史图式——"宗教的祛魅"外溢导致"世界的祛魅", 后者也为"诸神之争"背景之下的"复魅"留下了讨论空间。

关键词: 祛魅, 复魅, 马克斯·韦伯, 德国浪漫主义, 巴尔塔萨·贝克尔

Abstract:

This paper attempts to trace the origins of Max Weber's concept of "disenchantment"(Entzauberung) and its associated narrative through a combination of etymological analysis and and intellectual genealogy. It identifies two primary sources: German Romanticism represented by Schiller, and the 17th-century Dutch theologian Balthasar Bekker. In his work The Gods of Greece, Schiller introduced the concept of "de-deification" (Entgötterung), which was not merely a nostalgic or anti-Enlightenment gesture, but an attempt to improve humanity through the divine. German Romantics placed significant emphasis on "witchcraft" or "magic" (Zauber), proposing monism and aesthetics as pathways to overcome the shortcomings of a mechanistic worldview; Meanwhile Bekker's anti-witchcraft stance, drawing upon Cartesian dualism, argues for the ineffectiveness of witchcraft in defense of faith. Both approaches left their own unresolved issues: German Romanticism's aesthetic solution remained accessible only to a small intellectual elite, failing to address society as a whole, while its anthropomorphic theology proved unrealistic. Bekker's anti-witchcraft position, on the other hand, encountered two formidable challenges: the relationship between magic and religion, and the universal history of human religion. Weber's writings during World War I synthesised insights from both sources, addressing their respective unresolved problems to complete a "closure" of critical inquiry. On one hand, he recognized the void of meaning in modern civilization, advocating for "vocation"(Beruf) to combat the existential weariness; on the other, he proposed a historical schema of religious development, where the "disenchantment of religion" spilling over into the "disenchantment of the world", which in turn created room for discussions of "re-enchantment" against the backdrop of the "clash of the gods".

Key words: disenchantment, Re-enchantment, Max Weber, German Romanticism, Balthasar Bekker