社会杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 205-238.

• 论文 • 上一篇    

知识错位:医疗跨层级整合中的组织—专业互动

连逸晗()   

  • 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-10-27
  • 作者简介:连逸晗  中国人民大学社会学院, E-mail:1067573373@qq.com

Knowledge Misalignment: Organizational-Professional Interactions in Cross-Level Integration of Healthcare

Yihan LIAN()   

  • Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-10-27
  • About author:LIAN Yihan, School of Social Research, Renmin University of China, E-mail: 1067573373@qq.com

摘要:

专业知识与组织结构之间长期存在关联与张力,这一特点突出体现在不同级别医院之间的技术协作中。现有关于医疗资源整合的研究多聚焦于机构层面的障碍,而知识运作的复杂性尚未得到充分关注。本文基于“组织—专业”互动的分析框架,考察一家县级医院在“医联体”整合中承接上级医院技术下沉的案例。本文将由机构整合所引发的知识实践困境概括为“知识错位”,即在不同医院结成区域性联盟的过程中,医院、医生与医学技术的关系被重塑,这使得知识在转移过程中低效运作,并导致病患上移与功能重叠等后果,从而意外地让医联体建设偏离了“分级诊疗”的政策预期。基于此,本文拓展了医疗跨层级整合的社会学视角,并反思了中国医疗均等化进程中的制度张力。

关键词: 知识错位, 医联体, 组织整合, 知识转移, 分级诊疗

Abstract:

The relationship between expertise and organizational structures has long been marked by both interdependence and tension, a dynamic particularly evident in technology collaboration between hospitals at different hierarchical tiers. Existing studies on healthcare resource integration have predominantly focused on institutional barriers while overlooking the complex mechanisms underlying the operation of knowledge. This paper, based on an organizational-professional interaction framework, presents a case study of a county-level hospital integrating into a "medical consortium" system and receiving technical support from a higher-level hospital. The study conceptualizes the knowledge practice dilemma triggered by institutional integration as "knowledge misalignment", wherein the relationships between hospitals, physicians, and medical technologies are reconstructed during consolidation, leading to inefficient knowledge operations in circulation, application, and interaction. This misalignment result in unintended consequences such as upward migration and concentration of patients and functional overlap, thereby deviating from the policy objectives of the "tiered healthcare delivery system". Specifically, in terms of knowledge flow, physicians are constrained by organizational boundaries and career development incentives, leading to the short-term and inefficient nature of cross-institutional practice; in knowledge application, the mismatch between advanced technologies and primary healthcare settings increases medical risks; and in knowledge interaction, the unequal relationship between senior and junior doctors reinforces the dominance of specialized expertise, further marginalizing primary care. These mechanisms reveal the deep-seated challenges in healthcare resource integration. This study expands the sociological perspective on cross-level healthcare integration and critically reflects on the institutional tensions in China's pursuit of healthcare equity: professional knowledge systems are not merely passive objects controlled by administrative power, but rather closely intertwined with organizational conditions, constituting an integral element within the hierarchical structure of healthcare.

Key words: knowledge misalignment, medical consortium, organizational integration, knowledge transfer, tiered healthcare delivery system