社会杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 31-64.

• 专题:中国社会学的标识性概念 • 上一篇    下一篇

湘乡曾家与地方政治:论双轨制的内部张力与协作

凌鹏, 何骆   

  • 发布日期:2024-12-13
  • 作者简介:凌鹏 北京大学社会学系 E-mail:lingpeng0409@pku.edu.cn;何骆 北京大学社会学系
  • 基金资助:
    本文系教育部重大项目“十至十三世纪政治与社会再探研”(22JJD770005)子课题“国家治理形态的社会科学分析”的研究成果。

The Zeng Guofan Family and Local Politics:On the Internal Tension and Collaboration of the Dual-Track System

LING Peng, HE Luo   

  • Published:2024-12-13
  • Supported by:
    This paper is a research result of the sub-theme “Social Science Analysis of National Governance Patterns” of the major project of the Ministry of Education,“Re-exploration of Politics and Society in the Tenth and Thirteenth Centuries” (22JJD770005).

摘要: 本文以湘乡曾家为例探讨双轨制的内部张力与协作,认为双轨政治的基本特征是两个相分离的上下轨道而非一个轨道的上下两层,政统与道统是双轨政治形成的更根本的理论奠基。曾国藩意图分离双轨,期望家族在地方践行道统却想法难行;曾国潢在地方积累家族财势,走向与地方官私利勾连的同时也为联结政统和道统提供了实际基础。在这二人种种思虑与行动的共同作用下出现了曾麟书促成官绅合作的重要作为,达成了绅与官的合作,突破了政统与道统的分离。在双轨政治的结构中,理论与实践、国家与地方、私利和公益始终处于张力之中。不同时代的国家与士绅的关系是这一张力结构的不同样态。在此意义上,费孝通对民国政治问题的探讨亦是接续“双轨”精神的重要努力。

关键词: 曾国藩, 双轨制, 政统与道统, 地方自治, 费孝通

Abstract: This paper explores the internal tension and collaboration of the dual-track system in the case of the Zeng family in Xiangxiang, arguing that the basic feature of double track politics is two separate upper and lower tracks rather than two layers of a single track, and that the separation and linkage of the political system (zhengtong) and the ethical system (daotong) are much more fundamental than others as the theoretical foundation for the formation of the dual-track politics. The various tensions within the dual-track system were thoroughly manifested in the Zeng Guofan family’s involvement in local affairs in Xiangxiang. Zeng wanted to separate the double tracks, and expected his family to follow the ethical system in local affairs but his family did not share his view. Zeng Guohuang (his brother) had actively expanded his family’s wealth and power, disregarding Zeng Guofan’s repeated pleads not to be in collusion with the local officials’ private interests, and practically laying down a base for the linkage between the political and ethical systems. It was due to the ideas and actions of Zeng brothers that important events such as Zeng Linshu’s (Zeng’s father) involvement in helping collecting tax and his call on an upright official Zhu Shiqiao’s stay could have occurred. Thus, with Zhu’s dedication to serve people, a gentry and a government official had formed the kind of corporation that transcended the separation of the political and the ethic systems. In the structure of dual-track politics, theory and practice, national and local, private and public interest, are in tension with each other. The relationship between the state and the gentry in different times manifested differently in this tension structure. What Fei Xiaotong called the occlusion of politics in the Republic of China seemed to refer to a blockage of the passage between the top and the bottom, but the root of it in fact was the total loss of two sides separation of the dual-track and its internal tension. In this sense, Fei Xiaotong’s discussion of the politics of the Republic of China is an important contribution to the continuity of the spirit of the “dual-track”.

Key words: Zeng Guofan, the dual-track system, the political system and the ethical system, self-governance, Fei Xiaotong