社会杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 97-127.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

私有财产的温和化:卢梭与平等的政治经济学

赵雨淘   

  • 发布日期:2024-12-13
  • 作者简介:赵雨淘 中山大学中国公共管理研究中心、政治与公共事务管理学院 E-mail:zhaoyt56@mail.sysu.edu.cn

The Moderation of Private Property:Rousseau and the Political Economy of Equality

ZHAO Yutao   

  • Published:2024-12-13

摘要: 作为文明社会的重要批评者,卢梭对文明社会的制度基础——私有财产的态度十分复杂,既批评财产与自尊的结合导致不平等和败坏,又承认财产是政治社会和个人自由的基础。实际上,卢梭的政治经济学思考源于他对“非社会的社会性”的系统批判。针对文明社会中的自然人和公民,卢梭分别提出了救治方案。对于前者,要用自然必然性逻辑限制财产的道德和社会影响力,再通过对自尊激情的克制来培育普遍的人类之爱,最终在自然的“非社会性”和无私的“社会的社会性”之间建立平衡,塑造温和的财产所有者。对于后者,要通过个体与自然、个体与共同体的关系来阻断个体公民之间的比较和交往,构建“非社会性的社会”,也即一个温和的财产社会。

关键词: 卢梭, 私有财产, 自尊, 社会性, 政治经济学

Abstract: It is generally accepted that private property is the institutional foundation of modern civilised society. As an important critic of modern civilization,Rousseau’s attitude toward property seems ambiguous at first glance,criticising the inequality and corruption aroused by the integration of property and amour-propre,while at the same time recognizing that property is the sinew of political society and individual liberty. This article attempts to demonstrate that Rousseau’s ideas are in fact not contradictory and that his thinking on political economy is rooted in a systematic critique of “unsocial sociability”. According to Rousseau,once an individual must depend on others to satisfy his/her material and mental needs,distorted social relations will inevitable arise,leading to problems such as interpersonal oppression and the loss of one’s true nature. Rousseau provides different cures for the “natural man in civilised society”(Emile) and for the citizens. To make Emile a moderate property owner,Jean-Jacque limits the moral and social effects of private property with the logic of natural necessity,and then cultivates Emile’s universal love of humanity through the systematic restraint of amour-propre. As a consequence,Emile is a gentle property owner with a balance between natural “unsociability” and benevolent “sociable sociability”. To construct a moderate society,the scope of private property must be determined by natural necessity,the general will must be obeyed by the individual citizen,the relationship between the individual and the community must be used to block interpersonal comparisons,and economic policies to control the polarisation of the rich and the poor must be carried out. Such a society could be termed as “a society without sociability”. In sum,Rousseau’s political economy is distinct from mainstream contemporary liberalism,socialism and liberal egalitarianism,and remains an important inspiration for understanding inequality today.

Key words: Rousseau, private property, amour-propre, sociability, political economy