社会杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 31-70.

• 专题:组织社会学 • 上一篇    下一篇

打破铁笼:以“关系”和“变通”为线索的美国新韦伯主义官僚制研究

刘畅()   

  • 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 作者简介:刘畅  美国圣母大学社会学系, E-mail:cliu24@nd.edu

Breaking the Iron Cage: Personal Ties, Adaptive Rule-Bending, and the Neo-Weberian Reconstruction of Bureaucracy

Chang LIU()   

  • Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-03-17
  • About author:LIU Chang, Department of Sociology, University of Notre Dame, E-mail: cliu24@nd.edu

摘要:

面对西方社会思潮对官僚制的全面抨击,新韦伯主义以全球视角审视官僚制在不同制度和文化中的变体,探索积极的官僚实践,并系统反思了韦伯所提出的官僚制特征。由此,“关系”和“变通”成为新韦伯主义的重要议题。本文回顾了新韦伯主义形成的历史背景,以对“关系”和“变通”的积极理解为线索,系统梳理相关经验研究,进而揭示其背后的理论预设与思想资源。研究发现,新韦伯主义复兴官僚制的努力本质上是一场试图以价值理性修复形式理性缺陷的理论探索,“关系”与“变通”只是工具性手段,其中的关键在于重塑官员的理性精神。然而,新韦伯主义对理性精神的技术性构想依赖于对官员主体性的普遍性假设,忽略了不同制度与历史背景下伦理秩序的多样性,也遮蔽了官僚制之外可能存在的正当性基础。

关键词: 官僚制, 新韦伯主义, 关系, 变通, 组织研究

Abstract:

In response to sweeping critiques of bureaucracy in Western intellectual discourse, the neo-Weberian tradition has adopted a global perspective to examine how bureaucratic institutions take shape across diverse institutional and cultural contexts. Seeking to recover the constructive potential of bureaucracy, this body of work reconsiders Weber's canonical features and explores their pragmatic and normative adaptations. Within this framework, particular attention has been paid to two themes—personal ties and adaptive rule-bending—both of which hold significant relevance for governance practices in China. This article traces the historical origins of the neo-Weberian research, reviews representative empirical studies centered on these two elements, and excavates the theoretical assumptions and normative commitments that underpin them. I argue that the so-called "revival of bureaucracy" is, at its core, a search for how value rationality might be re-integrated into systems increasingly dominated by formal rationality. The use of personal ties or adaptive rule-bending is treated as a strategic means through which morally conscious bureaucrats might absorb, recalibrate, and ultimately incorporate anti-bureaucratic elements into a rationalized administrative order. Yet this technocratic vision of bureaucratic moral agency rests on a universalizing assumption: that commitment to the public sphere, distinct from private interests, constitutes the sole legitimate foundation of bureaucratic ethics. This assumption overlooks the plural moral orders embedded in distinct institutional and historical contexts and forecloses the possibility of alternative sources of organizational legitimacy beyond the bureaucratic form itself. While the neo-Weberian framework offers valuable reparative insights, it remains confined by the limits of its own theoretical imagination. For scholars of Chinese governance, this calls for a renewed effort to locate moral and institutional foundations for bureaucracy that are rooted in indigenous historical experience and ethical traditions.

Key words: bureaucracy, neo-Weberianism, personal ties, adaptive rule-bending, organization studies