社会杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 211-240.

• 论文 • 上一篇    

“生命为了艺术,艺术为了生命”:齐美尔论艺术与生命的协调

曹金羽()   

  • 出版日期:2026-07-20 发布日期:2026-09-18
  • 作者简介:

    曹金羽  深圳大学社会学系、深圳大学全球特大型城市治理研究院,E-mail:

    CAO Jinyu, Department of Sociology, Shenzhen University; Institute for Global Mega-City Governance, Shenzhen University, E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“神圣社会的谱系学研究”(24CSH004)

"Life for Art, Art for Life": Simmel on the Harmony between Art and Life

Jinyu CAO()   

  • Online:2026-07-20 Published:2026-09-18
  • Supported by:
    the Youth Project of the National Social Science Fund of China(24CSH004)

摘要:

齐美尔的艺术社会学以“生命为了艺术,艺术为了生命”作为内在线索,通过对米开朗基罗、伦勃朗、罗丹等艺术家及其作品的分析,揭示了艺术与生命的统一性。他强调,艺术的自主性并非与生命隔绝,而是在“整体性的迂回”中实现其与生命整体性的融合,以此协调自主性与整体性的矛盾。这些不同的艺术家代表了不同时期人们对艺术与生命关系的持续探索:米开朗基罗的作品呈现了形式重负下的悲剧性,伦勃朗展现了内在灵魂的胜利,罗丹则呈现出现代性的运动与生命活力。上述发现对于理解现代社会中个体与社会、生命与形式的关系具有重要意义,为艺术社会学提供了独特的视角和深刻的理论洞见,并强调了艺术在现代生活中对于个体意义建构与生命价值实现的重要作用。

关键词: 为艺术而艺术, 框架, 形式, 生命, 英雄主义

Abstract:

This article seeks to reconstruct the inner logic of Georg Simmel's fragmented writings on art from the perspective of the sociology of art. Through his analysis of artistic form, Simmel identifies the structural tensions in modern society between the individual and the whole, life and form, subjective freedom and objective culture. "Life for art, art for life" constitutes the central proposition of his sociology of art: art must achieve autonomy through boundary, style, and form, thereby forming a self-sufficient wholeness of the work; yet it must also remain connected, through the "the detour of the whole, " to the larger totality of life, so as to avoid degenerating into a closed and impoverished formalism. Following this line of inquiry, the article further examines the different historical structures of subjectivity embodied by Michelangelo, Rembrandt, and Rodin. Michelangelo represents the burden imposed upon individual life by supra-individual universal form in the Renaissance, revealing the tragic personality of an individuality whose formation remains incomplete. Rembrandt, through portraiture, light and shadow, facial expressions, and inner life, presents the rise of inwardness, the individuation of personality, and the formation of the modern subject in early modern society. Rodin, through movement, the laboring body, and fleeting gesture, inscribes into bodily form the speed, stimulation, rupture, and sensory unease of modern urban life, showing how the modern subject seeks to recover unity in a world of flux. In this sense, Simmel's writings on art do not reduce art to its social background; rather, they reveal how artistic form refracts social form, types of subjectivity, and the spirit of an age. The significance of art in modern society, therefore, lies not in offering an illusory escape from reality, but in giving new form to fragmented life, enabling individuals to reconstruct meaning, dignity, and a form of everyday heroism within the divided experience of modern existence.

Key words: art for art's sake, frame, form, life, heroism