社会杂志

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会需求、资源供给、制度变迁与民间组织发展——基于中国省级经验的实证研究

作者1:李国武 中央财经大学社会发展学院;作者2:李璐国家发展与改革委员会宏观经济研究院   

  1. 作者1:李国武 中央财经大学社会发展学院;作者2:李璐国家发展与改革委员会宏观经济研究院
  • 出版日期:2011-11-20 发布日期:2011-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 李国武 中央财经大学社会发展学院 E-mail:leeguowu@126.com
  • 作者简介:作者1:李国武 中央财经大学社会发展学院;作者2:李璐国家发展与改革委员会宏观经济研究院
  • 基金资助:

    本研究得到2011年度国家社会科学基金项目(11CSH060)和中央财经大学“211工程”三期建设项目资助

Social Demand, Resources Supply, Institutional Transition, and Development of Civil Organizations: Based on Chinese ProvinceLevel Evidence

Author 1: Li Guowu,School of Social Development,Central University of Finance and Economics;Author 2:Li  Lu,Academy of Macroeconomic Research,National Development and Reform Commission   

  1. Author 1: Li Guowu,School of Social Development,Central University of Finance and Economics;Author 2:Li  Lu,Academy of Macroeconomic Research,National Development and Reform Commission
  • Online:2011-11-20 Published:2011-11-20
  • Contact: Li Guowu,School of Social Development,Central University of Finance and Economics E-mail:leeguowu@126.com
  • About author:Author 1: Li Guowu,School of Social Development,Central University of Finance and Economics;Author 2:Li Lu,Academy of Macroeconomic Research,National Development and Reform Commission
  • Supported by:

    The research was supported by The National Social Science Fund (11CSH060) and “211 Project” for Central University of Finance and Economics (the 3rd phase

摘要:

本文从社会需求、供给和制度主义这三种视角解释民间组织发展的差异,在此基础上,提出中国转型时期民间组织发展地区差异的研究假设,并利用2001-2008年省级层次面板数据进行检验。研究表明,三种理论视角都有一定的解释力;但影响社会团体、民办非企业单位和基金会三种不同类型民间组织发展的具体因素各不相同;中国民间组织的发展嵌入于其所处的地方社会情境之中,它不仅反映了地区的社会需求结构和居民资源状况,还受到地区经济制度和社会保障制度变迁进程的影响。

 

关键词: 社会需求 , 资源供给, 制度变迁, 民间组织

Abstract:

The explanation of the differences in the development of civil organizations is from three theoretical perspectives of social demand, supply, and institutionalism, which served as the basis for our research hypotheses about the development of civil organizations during the transitional period in China. These hypotheses were tested using provincelevel panel data from 2001 to 2008. The results showed that each of the three perspectives had some explanatory power; however, distinctive factors influenced three different types of civil organizations (Social Groups, Private NonEnterprise Organizations, and Foundations). The development of civil organizations was embedded in the social contexts where they were located, which not only reflected the regional structure of social demands and its residents’ resources but also was affected by the transitional process of the economic and social security institutions in the particular region.

Key words:  social demand, resource supply, institutional transition, civil organizations