社会杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 134-.

• 专题:知识社会学在中国 • 上一篇    下一篇

“乡土”与超越“乡土”:费孝通与雷德斐尔德的文明社会研究

张江华   

  • 出版日期:2015-07-20 发布日期:2015-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 张江华,上海大学社会学院人类学民俗学研究所 E-mail: jhzhang903@hotmail.com E-mail:jhzhang903@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:张江华,上海大学社会学院人类学民俗学研究所

“Folk Society” and Beyond: A Comparative Study of Fei Xiaotong and Robert Redfield’s Works on Civilization Studies#br#

ZHANG Jianghua   

  • Online:2015-07-20 Published:2015-07-20
  • Contact: ZHANG Jianghua, Institute of Anthropology and Folklore, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University. E-mail: jhzhang903@hotmail.com E-mail:jhzhang903@hotmail.com
  • About author:ZHANG Jianghua, Institute of Anthropology and Folklore, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University.

摘要: 20世纪20年代末至50年代初,人类学学科领域从传统的部落社会研究扩展到对文明社会的研究,费孝通与雷德斐尔德两位人类学家为这一转变做出了重要的开拓性贡献。本文梳理了这一过程的学术史,认为是这一时期人类学与社会学的结合导致两人不约而同发现“乡土”社会。两人都对文明社会研究进行了理论与方法上的拓展:在处理社区多样性方面,费孝通使用类型比较法,雷德斐尔德则提出了乡村—都市连续统模式;而在纵向社会结构方面,两人都提出类似的城乡一体的整体社会结构模式。本文描述了他们两人之间的互动与相互影响,并对二者的差异性进行了评述。

关键词: 类型, 模式, 大传统, 文明社会, 小传统, 乡土社会

Abstract: In between the late 1920s and the early 1950s, anthropology in the West expanded its research from the traditional focus on primitive tribes to civilized societies. Fei Xiaotong and Robert Redfield were two important anthropologists who spearheaded this transition. This paper offers a historical account of their contribution as well as an academic comparative review of their works. The convergence and divergence of Fei and Redfield’s academic life can be summarized in four points: (1) their unique academic background coincidentally led to both men’s engagement in studies of “folk society” during the 1930s, when anthropology and sociology were experiencing a trend of blending with each other; (2) after the 1940s, Fei and Redfield became acquainted and remained very close colleagues throughout their life time. Their friendship and collaboration were extremely beneficial to the academic career of both men; (3) in terms of methodology, Fei was more keen in pattern analysis and comparative studies, by which he believed an understanding of the whole society could be reached. Redfield was more interested in concepts and conceptual frameworks. His FolkUrban Continuum, used to explain the problems of community diversity and cultural changes, was a typical example; (4) even though they favored different methodology, Fei and Redfield both suggested a unified society on a rural and urban integrated structure. Fei and Redfield represented a parallel development of studies of civilizations in China and in the West, each with their own uniqueness and differences. Fei, like other Chinese social scientists of the time, lived through a painful period of national crisis and humiliation during his intellectual awakening. This historical burden colored the way he perceived the world and put certain strains on his knowledge.

Key words: great tradition, civilizations, small tradition
,
folk society