社会杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 198-214.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

从“策略”到“伦理”:对“依法抗争”的批评性讨论

吴长青  中国政法大学社会学院   

  1. 吴长青  中国政法大学社会学院
  • 出版日期:2010-03-20 发布日期:2010-03-20
  • 基金资助:

    本文是教育部人文社会科学项目“弱势群体的群体利益表达机制研究”(06JA840020)的阶段性成果之一,并得到中国政法大学211工程三期建设项目的资助。
      

From Strategies to Ethics:A Critique of the “Rightful Resistance”

Wu Changqing, School of Sociology,China University of Political Science and Law   

  1. Wu Changqing, School of Sociology,China University of Political Science and Law
  • Online:2010-03-20 Published:2010-03-20
  • Supported by:

    This thesis is one part of the phased subjects of the research “Benefit Expression Mechanism of the Vulnerable Group”(06JA840020),which granted by Humanities and Social Science Programs of Ministry of Education

摘要:

受“依法抗争”概念的影响,当前的农民抗争研究过于强调抗争过程中的策略,忽略了抗争中伦理的重要性。笔者在概括“依法抗争”洞察力基础上,指出了其局限性,并试图引入伦理视角以弥补这一缺陷。本文继而评述了伦理视角的研究进展,在田野研究的基础上,探讨了伦理视角在研究农民抗争中的独到解释力。

 

 

关键词: 收放权边界, 集权与分权, 风险治理效率, 理论模型, 依法抗争,   农民抗争,   策略 , 伦理

Abstract:

This paper contends that, due to the influence from the concept of “rightful resistance,” current studies on rural protests have overemphasized the strategies in the protest process but neglected the importance of the ethics. After summarizing the insights from the “rightful resistance,” the author points out its limitation and tries to remedy it by bringing in the ethical perspective. The paper then moves on to describe the research process with the ethical perspective. Finally, on the basis of the author's field research, the paper discusses the original explanatory power of ethics in the rural protest research.

Key words: political risks and efficiency, the borders of governances, centralization and decentralization, ethics, rightful resistance, rural protest, strategy