社会杂志

• 专题:行政发包制研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

再论行政发包制:对评论人的回应

  

  1. 周黎安  北京大学光华管理学院
  • 出版日期:2014-11-20 发布日期:2014-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 周黎安 北京大学光华管理学院 E-mail:zhoula@gsm.pku.edu.cn

Rethinking Administrative Subcontract:Reply

  1. ZHOU Li-An,Guanghua School of Management,Peking University
  • Online:2014-11-20 Published:2014-11-20
  • Contact: ZHOU Li-An,Guanghua School of Management,Peking University E-mail:zhoula@gsm.pku.edu.cn

摘要: 本文对周雪光、张静、曹正汉和冯仕政四位教授的评论文章进行了回应。笔者的回应侧重在各位评论人提出的带有批判性质的意见和建议上。笔者和评论人的分歧主要集中在行政发包制的界定、内涵和形成原因、统治风险的内涵和影响、发包人和承包人的权力配置等问题上,对于这些问题,笔者试图做进一步的澄清和解释。鉴于评论人的批评建议,本文也讨论了行政发包制未来可以进一步扩展和完善的领域。最后,笔者提出了一个好的理论的三个标准,并讨论了跨学科交流对于发展好理论的重要意义。

关键词: 行政发包制 , 科层制 , 政治锦标赛, 政府治理

Abstract: This piece serves as a response to the comments on my paper “Administrative Subcontract” made by Zhou Xueguang,Zhang Jing,Cao Zhenghan,and Feng Shizheng. My reply focuses both on their critical comments and suggestions. Our differences center on such issues as the definition,content,and causes of administrative subcontract system,the definition and implications of ruling risks,and authority allocation between the principal and the agent. In the reply I try to clarify the confusions and explain the reasons why we differ in these matters and indicate my stance. Following the commentators’ critical comments and suggestions,I also discuss the possibilities and directions for further  improvement of the administrative subcontract theory. In the  conclusion,I propose three criteria for a good theory and highlight the importance of interdisciplinary academic exchange and interaction in developing a good theory.

Key words: administrative subcontract ,  government governance , bureaucracy , political tournament