社会杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 161-183.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国农村宗教复兴与“宗教”的中国命运

梁永佳    中国农业大学人文与发展学院社会学系   

  • 出版日期:2015-01-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 梁永佳 中国农业大学人文与发展学院社会学系 Email: yjliang@cau.edu.cn E-mail:yjliang@cau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:梁永佳 中国农业大学人文与发展学院社会学系
  • 基金资助:
    本文系中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助“中国农村宗教信仰与社会管理研究”(No.2012RC027)的研究成果。

Religious Revival in Rural China and the Fate of “Religion” in China

LIANG Yongjia, Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University   

  • Online:2015-01-20 Published:2015-01-20
  • Contact: LIANG Yongjia, Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Email: yjliang@cau.edu.cn E-mail:yjliang@cau.edu.cn
  • About author:LIANG Yongjia, Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University
  • Supported by:
    This paper is one of the outputs of the project “Rural Religious Belief and Social Administration in China” (No.2012RC027), supported by the Chinese Universities Scientific Fund.

摘要: 中国农村宗教复兴是改革开放以来最“出人意料”的现象之一。对此,学界提出了“传统的发明”、“国家—社会关系”、“宗教市场”三种解释模式。本文认为,解释中国农村宗教复兴,不能将宗教现象还原为“政治”或“经济”等其他范畴,而应将之视为一种自成一类的事实,一种人的基本条件,同时应充分理解政治精英和知识精英在中国近现代史上对 “宗教”的塑造过程。中国农村的宗教复兴在很大程度上游离于这一塑造过程之外,因此,可能存在着尚不为学界所充分认识的社会机制,有着提供本土理论的潜力。本文认为,在世俗化理论和市场理论之外,应该尝试使用“礼物模式”探索这一社会机制。

关键词: 农村宗教复兴 , 宗教市场理论 , 精英与宗教 , 礼物模式

Abstract: The paper explores three aspects of the question of religious revival in rural China, one of the most “unexpected” phenomena since the beginning of Reform and Openup policy. Firstly, by offering a critical reappraisal to the three models of explaining religious revival—“invention of traditions”, “statesociety relation”, and “religious market theory”, the author argues that religion should not be reduced into such categories as “politics” or “economy”, but should be taken as a set of sui generis facts. In particular, the author delineates some premises implied in the religious market theory, premises that are rather Christian and cannot fit in the Chinese context. Secondly, it is necessary to understand the particular process of shaping “religion” by the political and intellectual elites in modern Chinese history. Academic claims to legitimize some of the religious practices merely continue the complicity within these elites. Thirdly, religious revival in rural China is largely separated from this process of elite complicity, implying an unknown mechanism potential to yield in an indigenous social theory. Referring to the recent model of “doing religion”, the author emphasizes the dimension of morality central to social solidarity. Finally, the author suggests that rather than recourse to secularization theory or market theory, we may try “gift model” to study this mechanism.

Key words:  , religious revival in rural China ,   elite and religion ,  religious market theory , gift model