社会杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 49-73.

• 专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

宗法、丧服与庙制:儒家早期经典与宋儒的宗族理论

林鹄 中国社会科学院历史研究所   

  • 出版日期:2015-01-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 林鹄 中国社会科学院历史研究所 Email:linhu@cass.org.cn E-mail:linhu@cass.org.cn
  • 作者简介:林鹄 中国社会科学院历史研究所

Ancestor and Chinese Lineage:What the Great Chinese Minds Thought about It

LIN Hu,Institute of History,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences   

  • Online:2015-01-20 Published:2015-01-20
  • Contact: LIN Hu,Institute of History,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Email:linhu@cass.org.cn E-mail:linhu@cass.org.cn
  • About author:LIN Hu,Institute of History,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘要: 宗族是理解中国社会的关键之一,这已是学界共识,但以往研究多把宗族视为基于现实利益而产生的工具,忽视古人关于宗族内在逻辑的言说。本文分析了早期儒家和宋儒的宗族观,认为古人关于宗族的种种制度安排实际上是基于复杂而深刻的伦理思想。宗族之所以在中国具有如此长久而旺盛的生命力,原因或在于此。

关键词: 别子, 宗族 , 丧服 , 庙制 , 宗法

Abstract:  As widely agreed, lineage is one of the keys to understand traditional Chinese society. Nevertheless, ignoring ancient discourses on lineage, current scholarship often assumes that lineage was made and remade by and for power.
Instead, this article argues that we must take efforts to understand what the great Chinese minds thought about lineage and why, not taking the modern or postmodern position for granted. As a small step moving towards this goal, the paper gives an outline of lineage theory contained in Confucius Classics and that of NeoConfucians.
In Classics, lineage theory is composed of three parts: Zongfa, Mourning system, and ancestral temple system. Zongfa, the center of lineage theory, is the organizing principle of lineage that mandates that only the wife’s eldest son can serve as the lineage head, whose main responsibility is to lead the lineage to offer sacrifices to ancestors. While the Mourning system is also mainly based on social relationship, personal virtue plays a minor but important role. On the other hand, ancestral temple system is built largely according to personal virtue. Lineage activities center on funerals and sacrifices, and lineage head is granted neither political nor economic power to control the lineage.
While NeoConfucians inherited the main spirit of Classics, they also modified classical lineage theory in important ways in order to come to terms with the changing social reality. First, NeoConfucians allowed commoners to adopt Zongfa as the ruling principle for lineage making, because economic development and social mobility produced many rich and welleducated commoners. Secondly, the political hierarchy embedded in the ancestral temple system was largely abandoned. In Classics, ancestral temple system served as a supplement to Zongfa. But for NeoConfucians, the predicament was exactly the dying influence of Zongfa. Therefore, under this circumstance, ancestral temple became the main focus for the rebirth of Zongfa.
In short, this article argues that ancient discourses on lineage were not ideologies as frivolously assumed, but provide complex and insightful thoughts on human nature. At least partially due to this, lineage has played a long and vigorous role in Chinese society.

Key words: mourning system , detached son, Zongfa ,  ancestral temple system , lineage