世纪末忧郁与美国精神气质——帕森斯与古典社会理论的现代转变

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 帕森斯的《社会行动的结构》体现了一种独特的探究，历史的、经验的和理论的研究在其中融为一体。在学科史的意义上，《结构》标志着“古典”社会理论的“现代”转变。不过，帕森斯是以一种典型的“美国式”方式完成这种转变的。囿于20世纪20、30年代、尤其是“新政”时期的语境，他给予处于世纪之交的一些重要的社会理论一种全新的阐述，把它们从其生身处境的“世纪末”中剥离出来，并暗中赋予其一种积极、乐观的“美国精神气质”，在很大程度上消解了这些理论和经验探讨中原本具有的同“世纪末”的社会、文化背景及其时代问题的复杂关联。悖谬的是，这种“美国化”的阐述在某种意义上恰恰体现了帕森斯试图建构社会（科）学一般理论的宏图，蕴含着某种普遍历史的取向。

关键词: 世纪末忧郁 , 塔尔科特·帕森斯 , 美国精神气质, 《社会行动的结构》 , 古典社会理论

Abstract: Talcott Parsons’s the Structure of Social Action (1937) presents a unique inquiry, in which historical, empirical and theoretical approaches were blended together. The book treated social theories of the late 19th and early 20th century and the practical inquires made by those social theorists as the object of its empirical study, however, what it had accomplished was a foundational structure for social theories and their future development. The Structure forged a link between what was before and what came after in the history of sociology, marking the modern transition of classical sociological theories. On the one hand, by exploring major social theory contributors at the turn of the century, the Structure started a reflective sociological examination of its own tradition and development. On the other hand, by considering the totality of all the contributions, the Structure incorporated the basic elements of the classical social theories into modern a social action theory, or “voluntaristic theory of action” in Parsons’ term. Parsons’ book was written during the New Deal era. Under the influence of his time, Parsons gave an entirely new reading to the classical social theories. His interpretation hinted a typically activist and optimistic nature of “American ethos” and therefore separated the classical theories to the problems of their time. Interestingly, this Americanized interpretation serves as an evidence of Parsons’ ambition to build a universally applicable theoretical structure of social science.

Key words: classical social theory , Melancholia fin-de-siècle , Talcott Parsons , The Structure of Social Action , American ethos

赵立玮. 世纪末忧郁与美国精神气质——帕森斯与古典社会理论的现代转变[J]. 社会杂志, 2015, 35(6): 1-30.

ZHAO Liwei. Melancholoa fin-de-siècle and American Ethos: Parsons and the Modern Transition of Classical Social Theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2015, 35(6): 1-30.

参考文献

格哈特，乌塔. 2009. 帕森斯思想评传［M］. 李康，译. 北京大学出版社.
加达默尔，汉斯—格奥尔格. 2003. 真理与方法（上卷）［M］. 洪汉鼎，译. 上海译文出版社.
贡巴尼翁，安托瓦纳. 2009. 反现代派——从约瑟夫·德·迈斯特到罗兰·巴特［M］. 郭宏安，译. 北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店.
卡琳内斯库，马泰. 2002. 现代性的五副面孔［M］. 顾爱彬、李瑞华，译. 北京：商务印书馆.
黑格尔. 1959. 哲学史演讲录（第一卷）［M］. 贺麟、王太庆，译. 北京：商务印书馆.
黑格尔. 1979. 精神现象学（上、下卷）［M］. 贺麟、王玖兴，译. 北京：商务印书馆.
库恩，托马斯. 2003. 科学革命的结构［M］. 金吾伦、胡新和，译. 北京大学出版社.
勒佩尼斯，沃尔夫. 2011. 何谓欧洲知识分子：欧洲历史中的知识分子和精神政治［M］. 李焰明，译.
洛夫乔伊，阿瑟·O. ［1936］2015. 存在巨链——对一个观念的历史研究［M］. 张传友、高秉江，译. 北京：商务印书馆.
田耕. 2006. 为什么写作社会学理论史——读默顿《论理论社会学》［J］. 社会学研究（1）：227-35.
亚历山大，杰弗里·C. 2003. 新功能主义及其后［M］. 彭牧等，译. 南京：译林出版社.
亚历山大，杰弗里·C. 2006. 经典文本的核心地位［J］. 赵立玮，译. 社会理论(2)：180-231.
赵立玮. 2012. “韦伯的帕森斯化”与“韦伯派帕森斯”——基于韦伯—帕森斯思想关联性的考察［G］. // 社会理论：现代性与本土化. 应星、李猛，编. 北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店：155-204.
Alexander, Jeffrey Charles. 1982. Positivism, Presuppositions, and Current Controversies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Alexander, Jeffrey Charles. 1984. The Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought: Talcott Parsons. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2001. “Parsons as a Republican Critic of Industral Society: A New Understanding of the Early Writings.” In Parsons’ The Structure of Social Action and Contemporaary Debates, edited by Gabriele Pollini and Giuseppe Sciortino. Milano: FrancoAngeli: 9-23.
Brick, Howard. 1993. “The Reformist Dimension of Talcott Parsons’s Early Social Theory.” In The Culture of the Market: Historical Essays. Edited by Thomas L. Haskell and Richard F. Teichgraeber III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 357-96.
Camic, Charles. 1979. The Utilitarian Revisited. American Journal of Sociology 85: 515-50.
Camic, Charles. 1989. “Structure after 50 Years: The Anatomy of a Charter.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 38-107.
Ellenberger, Henri F. 1970.The Discovery of the Unconscious. New York: Basic Books.
Gerhardt, Uta. 1993. “Introduction: Talcott Parsons’s Sociology of National Socialism.”In Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, edited by Uta Gehardt. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Gerhardt, Uta. 1999. “National Socialism and the Politics of The Structure of Social Action.” In Agenda for Sociology: Classic Sources and Current Use of Talcott parsons’s Work, edited by Bernard Barber and Uta Gehardt. BadenBaden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft: 87-164.
Gerhardt, Uta. 2002. Talcott Parsons: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gerhardt, Uta. 2011. The Social Thought of Talcott Parsons: Methodology and American Ethos. Burlington: Ashgate.
Gould, Mark. 1991. “The Structure of Social Action: at least Sixty Years Ahead of its Time.” In Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity, edited by Roland Robertson and Bryan S. Turner. London: SAGE Publications: 85-107.
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1973. “Romanticism and Classicism: Deep Structures in Social Science.” In For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. New York: Basic Books, Inc.: 323-66.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1981. “Talcott Parsons: Problems of Theory Construction.” Sociological Inquiry 51: 173-96.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984, 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols., translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press (vol.1, 1984; vol. 2, 1987).
Hawthorn, Geoffrey. ［1976］1987. Enlightenment and Despair: A History of Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, H. Stuart. 1958. Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought, 1890—1930. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
Leck, Ralph M. 2000. Georg Simmel and avantgarde sociology: the birth of modernity, 1880—1920. Amherst, New Yok: Humanity Books.
Merton, Robert K. 1948. “Discussion.” American Sociological Review 13 (2): 164-8.
Merton, Robert K. ［1949］1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
Mestrovic, Stjepan G. 1991. The Coming fin de siècle: An Application of Durkheim’s Sociology to Modernity and Postmodernism. London: Routledge.
Munch, Richard. 1987. Theory of Action: Towards a New Synthesis Going Beyond Parsons. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Nisbet, Robert A. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. New York: McGrawHill Book Company (2nd Edition, Free Press, 1949; Paperback Edition, Free Press, 1968).
Parsons, Talcott. 1948. “The Position of Sociological Theory.” American Sociological Review 13 (2): 156-64.
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System, New York: Free Press.
Parsons, Talcott. ［1950］1954.“The prospects of Sociological Theory.”In Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: The Free Press: 348-69.
Parsons, Talcott.1970 “On Building Social System Theory: A Personal History.” In Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. New York: The Free Press: 22-76.
Parsons, Talcott. 1975. “The Present Status of ‘StructuralFunctional’ Theory.” In The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. Lewis A. Coser (ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: 67-83.
Parsons, Talcott. 1978.“A Paradigm of the Human Condition.” In Action Theory and the Human Condition, New York: Free Press: 352-433.
Parsons, Talcott. ［1928］1991. “Capitalism” in Recent German Literature: Sombart and Weber.” In Talcott Parsons: The Early Essays, edited by Charles Camic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press: 3-37.
Parsons, Talcott. 1991. “A Tentative Outline of American Values.” In Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity, edited by Roland Robertson and Bryan S. Turner. London: Sage Publications: 37-65.
Parsons, Talcott. 2007. American Society: A Theory of the Societal Community. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Procter, Ian. 1978. Parsons’s Early Voluntarism. Sociological Inquiry 48 (1): 37-48.
Seidman, Steven. 1983a. “Beyond Presentism and Historicism: Understanding the History of Social Science.” Sociological Inquiry 53 (1): 79-91.
Seidman, Steven. 1983b. Liberalism and the Origins of European Social Theory. Berkeley and Los Angeles：University of California Press.
Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1928. Contemporary Sociological Theories. New York：Harper & Brothers.
Turner, Bryan S. 1996. For Weber: Essays on the Sociology of Fate. London: Sage Publications.
Wearne, Bruce C. 1989. The Theory and Scholarship of Talcott Parsons to 1951: A Critical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wearne, Bruce C. 2013. “Exegetical Explorations: Parsons’ Convergence Concept.” American Sociologist 44: 233-44.
Whitehead, A. N. 1974. The Organization of Thought. Westport: Greenwood Press: 105-33.
Zeitlin, Irving M. ［1968］1987. Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: PrenticeHall, Inc.

责任编辑：路英浩