实践的紧迫性

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

紧迫性是实践的本质属性之一，实践紧迫性在思想史上却遭到长期遮蔽。布迪厄虽然曾多次提到这一议题，但从未有过专题论述。本文对实践紧迫性做了现象学社会学深描，澄清了它的三重必不可少的意蕴。通过考察人们对以独具时代特征的样式现身的实践紧迫性的体验，阐明了其所包含的三层意涵，同时揭示它对被诸事缠身的现代人的社会性情与心灵习性造成的影响。从实践紧迫性的意蕴，尤其是现代性情境下的实践紧迫性体验及其后果出发，本文重构了"实践紧迫性"这个具有生产性的概念，从而揭示了实践紧迫性及其体验之于理解与解释社会的可能性，至于实践紧迫性概念的其他理论意义则有待未来的探索。

关键词: 实践, 实践的紧迫性, 实践紧迫性体验

Abstract:

Urgency is one of the essential properties of practice,but the urgency of practice has long been forgotten in the history of social thought. AlthoughPierre Bourdieu repeatedly mentioned the urgency of practice in different texts,he never provided any thematic discourse on it.In this paper,we begin with a phenomenological-sociological description of the urgency of practice from its original site,arising cause,occurrencemechanism and presence mode. We reveal the tripleconnotations that the urgency of practicecontains:the urgency of time,the urgency of necessity,and highest urgency as a non-urgent state. Secondly,by examining the experience of the urgency of practice in the context of modernity,we not only expound the triple implications of the practical urgency experience,which are:eventual experience, temporal experience and emotional experience; but also explore the possible effect on modern people's social disposition and mind habits. From the connotations of the urgency of practice,especially the implications of the practical urgency experience,this paper re-discovers and re-constructs the concept of the urgency of practice on the one hand,and reveals the theoretical possibilities of the concept in understanding and interpreting social life on the other hand. As to the other theoretical meanings that the concept of the urgency of practice may contain,we need to explore this more in the future.

Key words: practice, the urgency of practice, the experience of practical urgency

罗朝明. 实践的紧迫性[J]. 社会杂志, 2017, 37(4): 188-216.

LUO Chaoming. The Urgency of Practice[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2017, 37(4): 188-216.

参考文献

巴恩斯,巴里、大卫·布鲁尔、约翰·亨利,主编.2003.科学知识:一种社会学的分析[M].邢冬梅、蔡仲,译.南京大学出版社.
鲍德里亚,让.2000.消费社会[M].刘成富、全志刚,译.南京大学出版社.
鲍曼,齐格蒙特.2002.流动的现代性[M].欧阳景根,译.上海三联书店.
鲍曼,齐格蒙特.2005.被围困的社会[M].郇建立,译.南京:江苏人民出版社.
布迪厄、华康德.2015.反思社会学导引[M].李康、李猛,译.北京:商务印书馆.
成伯清. 2009.怨恨与承认:一种社会学的探索[J].江苏行政学院学报47(5):59-65.
盖伦,阿诺德.2008.技术时代的人类心灵:工业社会的社会心理问题[M].何兆武、何冰,译.上海世纪出版集团.
哈代.1984.德伯家的苔丝[M].张谷若,译.北京:人民文学出版社.
海德格尔.2000.路标[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆.
海德格尔.2010.形而上学导论[M].熊伟、王庆节,译.北京:商务印书馆.
海德格尔.2012a.存在与时间[M].陈嘉映、王庆节,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.
海德格尔.2012b.哲学论稿:从本有而来[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆.
黑格尔.1996.精神现象学[M].贺麟、王玖兴,译.北京:商务印书馆.
胡塞尔.2001.欧洲科学危机与超验论现象学[M].王炳文,译.北京:商务印书馆.
胡塞尔.2007.现象学的观念[M].倪梁康,译.北京:人民出版社.
伽达默尔,汉斯-格奥尔格.2010.诠释学I:真理与方法[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆.
科西克,卡莱尔.1989.具体的辩证法:关于人与世界问题的研究[M].傅小平,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社.
罗朝明.2012.实践与实践性理解:布尔迪厄反思社会学的主题与品格[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版) 29(2):87-98.
马克思.1956.关于费尔巴哈的提纲[G]//马克思恩格斯全集(第一版·第三卷).北京:人民出版社:3-8.
马克思.1958.共产党宣言[G]//马克思恩格斯全集(第一版·第四卷).北京:人民出版社:461-504.
马克思. 1961. 路易·波拿巴的五月十八日[G]//马克思恩格斯全集(第一版·第八卷). 北京:人民出版社:117-127.
齐美尔.2006.叔本华与尼采:一组演讲[M].莫光华,译.上海译文出版社.
韦伯,马克斯.2004.支配社会学[M].康乐、简惠美,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社.
亚里士多德.2003.尼可马克伦理学[M].廖申白,译注.北京:商务印书馆.
Bergmann,Werner. 1992. "The Problem of Time in Sociology:An Overview of the Literature on the State of Theory and Research on the ‘Sociology of Time’,1900-82." Time & Society 1(1):81-134.
Bourdieu,Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction:A Social Critique of the Judgment of State. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu,Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. California:Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu,Pierre. 1994. In Other Words:Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge:Polity Press.
Bourdieu,Pierre. 1996. The State Nobility:Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Cambridge:Polity Press.
Bourdieu,Pierre. 1998. Practical Reason:On the Theory of Action. California:Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu,Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditation. California:Stanford University Press.
Brand,Gerd. 1973. "The Structure of the Life-World according to Husserl." Man and World 6(2):143-162.
Dreyfus,Hubert and Paul Rabinow. 1999. Bourdieu:A Critical Reader. Malden:Blackwell Publishers.
Durkheim,Emile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York:The Free Press.
Ellis,Carolyn. 1991. "Sociological Introspection and Emotional Experience." Symbolic Interaction 14(1):23-50.
Garfinkel,Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Los Angeles:University of California.
Habermas,Jurgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol.2). Boston:Beacon Press.
Heidegger,Martin. 2006. Mindfulness. New York:Continuum.
Honneth,Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition:The Moral Grammar of Social Conflict. Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
Husserl,Edmund. 1973. Experience and Judgment:Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jenkins,Richard. 1992. Pierre Bourdieu. London:Routledge.
Jung,Hwa Yol. 1988. "Being,Praxis and Truth:Toward a Dialogue between Phenomenology and Marxism." Dialectical Anthropology 12:307-328.
Kosik, Karel. 1976. Dialectics of the Concrete:A Study on Problems of Man and World. Dordrecht and Boston:D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Maton,Karl.2008. Bourdieu:Key Concepts. Durham:Acumen Publishing Limited.
Ranciere,Jacque. 1999. Disagreement:Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis:The University of Minnesota Press.
Rousseau,Jean-Jacques. 2008. The Social Contract. New York:Cosimo, Inc.
Schatzki,Theodore. 1996. Social Practices:A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Schutz,Alfred. 1945. "On Multiple Realities." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5(4):533-576.
Simmel,Georg.1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel.New York:Free Press.
Swartz, David. 1997. Culture and Power:The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
Throop, Jason and Keith Murphy. 2002. "Bourdieu and Phenomenology:A Critical Assessment." Anthropological Theory 2(2):185-207.
Wacquant,Loïc. 1989. "Towards a Reflexive Sociology:A Workshop with Pierre Bourdieu." Sociological Theory 7(1):26-63.
Whitehead,Alfred. 1979. Process and Reality:An Essay in Cosmology. New York:The Free Press.
Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1982. "The Standardization of Time:A Sociological Perspective." American Journal of Sociology 88(1):1-23.

[1]	谢晶. 从莫斯到列维—斯特劳斯:“玛纳”与实践观念的可译性[J]. 社会杂志, 2019, 39(5): 106-126.
[2]	星加良司. 试论残障社会模式的认识误区及其实践性陷阱[J]. 社会杂志, 2015, 35(6): 116-132.
[3]	刘正强. “甩干”机制：中国乡村司法的运行逻辑[J]. 社会杂志, 2014, 34(5): 147-173.
[4]	田先红. 基层信访治理中的“包保责任制” 实践逻辑与现实困境以鄂中桥镇为例[J]. 社会杂志, 2012, 32(4): 164-193.
[5]	赵万里\| 赵超. 生成图式与反思理性——解析布迪厄的知识社会学理论[J]. 社会杂志, 2012, 32(2): 33-50.
[6]	黄盈盈,王文卿,潘绥铭. 男民工与阶层、社会性别、性的主体建构[J]. 社会杂志, 2011, 31(5): 114-132.
[7]	黄晓春. 技术治理的运作机制研究——以上海市L街道一门式电子政务中心为案例[J]. 社会杂志, 2010, 30(4): 1-31.
[8]	刘建娥. 乡-城移民社会融入的实践策略研究：社区融入的视角[J]. 社会杂志, 2010, 30(1): 127-151.
[9]	刘建娥. 乡城移民社会融入的实践策略研究社区融入的视角[J]. 社会杂志, 2010, 30(1): 127-.
[10]	汪和建. 通向市场的社会实践理论：一种再转向[J]. 社会杂志, 2009, 29(5): 64-87.
[11]	林晓珊. 国外汽车消费社会学研究述评[J]. 社会杂志, 2008, 28(6): 194-214 .
[12]	张佩国. 反抗与惩罚——20世纪50年代嘉定县乡村的犯罪与财产法秩序[J]. 社会杂志, 2007, 27(4): 1-1 .
[13]	敬乂嘉. 实践、学科和范式：组织理论变迁综述 [J]. 社会杂志, 2006, 26(6): 165-165 .
[14]	张佩国. 乡村房产纠纷中的成员权及其实践逻辑[J]. 社会杂志, 2006, 26(4): 128-144.
[15]	童　敏. 中国本土社会工作专业实践的基本处境及其督导者的基本角色[J]. 社会杂志, 2006, 26(3): 194-204.