社会杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 121-148.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

从分税制到项目制:制度演进和组织机制

焦长权   

  1. 北京师范大学社会学院
  • 发布日期:2019-11-19
  • 作者简介:焦长权,E-mail:jiaochangquan@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文是国家社科基金青年项目“项目制对县级政府行为的影响机制研究”(17CSH068)的阶段性研究成果,同时感谢士恒教育基金会之“第七届士恒青年学者支持计划”的资助。

From Tax-Sharing System to the Program System: Institutional Evolution and Organizational Mechanism

JIAO Changquan   

  1. School of Sociology, Beijing Normal University
  • Published:2019-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This research was supported by National Social Science Fund (17CSH068) and the Seventh Shiheng Young Scholars Program of the Shiheng Education Foundation.

摘要: 分税制改革以后,中国随之进行了公共预算体制改革,由此形成了一种新的国家治理体制——项目制。地方政府的项目支出主要有三种类型:上级专项转移支付、上级非补助性项目支出和本级项目支出。三类项目支出在地方得以汇聚和重组,在很大程度上形塑了基层政府的财政结构。项目制本质上不是对科层制的一种摆脱或超越,而是国家主动对政府科层体系的一次完善和补充,是近代国家政权建设在新时期的延续与拓展。项目制的直接目的是“硬化”预算约束,深层目的是增强政府的回应能力,二者在实践中呈现一定张力,政府治理的理性化和技术化并不必然增强其对公共需求的回应能力,甚至可能形成反向效应。

关键词: 公共预算体制, 项目支出, 项目制, 理性化

Abstract: The 1994 fiscal reform brought in a new tax-sharing system that greatly changed the landscape of China's public finances and ushered in an era of "expansionary government fiscal policy". In order to effectively manage the huge revenue, the central government established the program system as a new budget management system that is based on departments as budget unit and program for funding.
Under the system, local governments incur three types of expenditure:earmark transfers, nongrant program funds from the superior government, and the program funds from the local government. The earmark transfers are an important piece of budgetary revenue at superior levels, and thus they should be treated as an integrated part of local government finance. These three types of expenditures have largely shaped the financial structure and governance mechanism of local governments. Typically,in practice, itemized departmental budgets at the beginning of fiscal year are rarely realized at the end. This problem has further encouraged program funding and has hastened off-table maneuvers in allocating money.
In essence, the program system is an attempt by the central government to improve and perfect the bureaucracy system. Its immediate goal is to "solidify" budgeting and ultimately to make the government more responsive to societal needs.Our study shows that in practice, tension rises between these two goals, suggesting that rationalization and professionalization of governance do not necessarily improve government responsiveness to public needs, in fact, the reverse is also quite possible.

Key words: budgeting system, program expenditure, program system, rationalization