社会杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 69-95.

• 专题: 生存与伦理:转型中国的劳工社会学 • 上一篇    下一篇

土客结合:资本下乡的用工机制研究

陈航英   

  1. 陕西师范大学哲学与政府管理学院社会学系
  • 发布日期:2021-07-22
  • 作者简介:陈航英,Email:hangying_chen@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文受到教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金西部和边疆地区项目“新型农业经营主体与乡土社会的互动关系研究”(项目编号:19XJC840001)的资助。

The Combination of Local and Non-Local Labor: A Sociological Study on the Employment Mechanism of External Capital in the Countryside

CHEN Hangying   

  1. Department of Sociology, School of Philosophy and Government, Shaanxi Normal University
  • Published:2021-07-22
  • Supported by:
    This paper is sponsored by "A Study on the Interactive Relationship Between the New Subjects of Agriculture and Rural Society"(19XJC840001), funded by the Humanities and Social Science Research Youth Fund Western and Frontier Region Project of Ministry of Education, PRC.

摘要: 本文以菜心产业为例探究资本下乡后的用工机制问题。研究发现,规模菜场采用的是一套以外地劳力为主、本地劳力为辅、“土客结合”的用工模式。以用工问题为切入点,本文从内部经营和外部环境两个角度探究了乡土社会影响下乡资本的运行逻辑的具体机制。本地劳力的使用可以使菜场在外部环境层面处理好与乡土社会的关系,但其家庭生计逻辑使得菜场在内部经营层面遭遇了用工困境。专业化又不失“乡土性”的外地劳力恰好能凭借同乡观念帮助菜场解决用工困境。这一用工模式揭示,下乡资本的经济逻辑必须以乡土逻辑为依据展开。

关键词: 资本下乡, 用工机制, 乡土社会, 乡土逻辑

Abstract: Taking the cabbage industry as a case study, this paper explores the employment mechanism of inflow capital in the countryside. The study finds that the large-scal e vegetable farms established by external investment adopt an employment model of "combination of local and non-local labor", in which non-local labor forms the major labor force while locals are used as supplements. The formation of this employment model is not due to the shortage of local labor but a result of the interaction and adjustment of external capital and rural society. The influence of rural society on external capital can be explored from the aspects of internal management and external environment. In terms of employment practices, the use of local labors enables the vegetable farms to connect with the rural society in the external environment but also brings potential issues of international management difficulties. The underlying reason is the conflict between the economic logic of the capital and the family livelihood logic of rural society. The specialized non-local laborers with rural background are just the right answer to the employment difficulties at the internal management because they are seen by locals as fellow rural townsmen. Therefore, this employment model including local and non-local labor has worked for the relationship between external capital and rural society. More importantly, this mode of employment reveals that, rather than ignoring the latter, the economic logic of capital must be based on the rural logic when capital goes to the countryside. It is in this sense that this paper argues that the employment mechanism of external capital is not a simple problem of labor supply and demand, but a complicated social process of outside investment and its relationship with the rural society.

Key words: capital goes into the countryside, employment mechanism, rural society, rural logic