社会杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 159-193.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

趋同与分化:雇主决策视角下高学历者的教育失配研究

李晓光   

  • 发布日期:2024-12-13
  • 作者简介:李晓光 西安交通大学人文社会科学学院、实证社会科学研究所 E-mail:xiaoguangli@xjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    本文是国家自然科学基金青年项目“中国高学历劳动者的教育-职业匹配研究:现状评估、影响机制和优化政策”(72204196)和中国博士后科学基金第16批特别资助“高学历劳动者的教育匹配:现状、成因与对策研究”(2023T160524)的阶段性成果。

Convergence and Divergence: Exploring Education-Occupation Mismatch among Highly Educated Individuals from an Employer Hiring Decision-Making Perspective

LI Xiaoguang   

  • Published:2024-12-13
  • Supported by:
    This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,Youth Project(72204196)and the 16th Special Grant of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023T160524).

摘要: 既往教育失配研究聚焦供给侧劳动者特征的影响,而较少关注需求侧招聘者及其雇佣决策的潜在作用。本文从新制度主义理论出发,聚焦劳动力市场的需求侧,分析组织的雇佣决策过程对教育失配的影响,并基于2023年中国在线联合调查实验研究数据开展实证分析。研究发现:第一,招聘决策环节存在“高配偏好”的趋同态势,即雇主倾向于招聘高于岗位实际所需学历的求职者。无论何种规模的组织,这种高配偏好都普遍存在,由此导致教育失配现象的涌现。第二,组织在招聘中的“高配偏好”因职业类型、工作经验要求和容错成本而存在明显分化态势,并且这种分化深受效率逻辑的驱动。第三,组织在招聘中的“高配偏好”因产权类型、行业类型和城市特征而呈现分化态势,而这种分化深受制度逻辑的支配。以上发现揭示出雇主决策视角下教育失配现象的产生机制,对于提升高学历者就业质量和促进经济高质量发展具有政策启示意义。

关键词: 教育匹配, 雇佣决策, 过度教育, 高配偏好, 简历实验, 新制度主义

Abstract: The imbalance between supply and demand in higher education and job market is reshaping the employment quality and life opportunities of the highly educated individuals in China. Due to the labor market’s inability to absorb the rapidly growing number of college graduates in a timely manner,the proportion of educational mismatches among the highly educated is rising rapidly. Previous research on educational mismatch has focused on the impact of supply-side characteristics (e.g.,college ranking,field of study,academic achievement,and credentials),but has rarely considered the potential role of demand-side recruiters and their hiring decisions (e.g.,organizational structure,job requirements,and institutional environment). This article,based on the neo-institutionalism theory,analyzes how the hiring decision processes on the demand side of the labor market affect educational mismatch,and provides an empirical analysis based on the data from the 2023 Conjoint Online Survey Research Experiment in China. The study finds:First,hiring decision processes show a convergent tendency towards a “preference for overqualification”, where employers tend to hire candidates with higher education levels than the jobs actually require. This preference for overqualification is prevalent across organizations of all sizes,leading to the rise of educational mismatch. Second,there is a clear divergence of overqualification preference in organizational hiring by occupation type, experience requirements,and tolerance for error,and this divergency is strongly driven by the logic of efficiency. Third,the overqualification preference in organizational hiring also varies based on type of ownership,type of industry,and urban environment,and this differentiation is governed by the logic of the system. The above findings reveal the mechanism of educational mismatch from the perspective of employers’ decision-making:on the one hand,facing with an oversupply of higher education degrees and high transaction costs in the recruitment process,rationalized organizations try to improve the hiring efficiency and reduce the recruitment risks through overqualification preference. On the other hand,in the face of the social recognition of highly educated people and the conceptual consensus of academic competitiveness in the industrial development,institutionalized organizations use overqualification preference to strengthen their own competitive advantage and to elevate their social status.

Key words: education-occupation matching, employer decision, overeducation, overqualification preference, audit study, neo-institutionalism