社会杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1-32.

• 专题一:文化与文明 •    下一篇

走出“初民社会”的两条路径:社区研究的文化论与马林诺夫斯基的文化接触学说

田耕()   

  • 出版日期:2026-07-20 发布日期:2026-09-18
  • 作者简介:

    田耕  北京大学社会学系, E-mail:

    TIAN Geng, Department of Sociology, Peking University, E-mial:

Two Ways Out of "Primitive Society": The Culture Theory of the Chinese Community Study and Malinowski's Theory of Culture Contact

Geng TIAN()   

  • Online:2026-07-20 Published:2026-09-18

摘要:

如果说走出“初民社会”是两次世界大战之间的一种跨国学术共识,那么燕京学派的社区研究如何从该共识中走出一条致力于重建文化国族的独特道路?本文通过对比马林诺夫斯基和社区研究的文化论这两种走出初民社会的方案,指出前者打造了一种深具现在史特征的“文化接触”概念,将“接触”视为自成一体的文化生成机制,这一观念最终和悬置国家、淡化文明与野蛮两分的国际主义结合在一起;反观后者,“一战”后,中国知识分子很早就开始反思和批评国际主义,这在刺激社区研究走出初民社会的同时,也以边政和边疆为枢纽,开拓了重返文化国族的社会学道路。社区与边政的呼应,推动社区研究者展开对于文化边界的分析,并进一步将民族建设视为社区的自然延伸。在方法层面,本文并未局限于学说的接触和接受史,而是以感通历史情势与理论心性的方式来呈现学说之间的关系。这种做法也是在世界史视域下反思中国现代学术的一种努力。

关键词: 文化接触, 国际主义, 社区研究, 文化边界

Abstract:

Given the one of the interwar intellectual consensuses that anthropology could go beyond the "primitive society", how did the community studies of the Yenching School carry on the exodus of the "primitive society" into an intellectual agenda of rebuilding the cultural nation? This paper compares the two ways out of the "primitive society" led by Bronislaw Malinowski and the cultural theory of the Chinese Community Study. Malinowski raised a deeply presentist idea of culture contact which theorized contact into a generative mechanism of culture by its own. Malinowski's way eventually joined an internationalist regime which downplayed the role of sovereign state and blurred the boundary between civility and primitivity. In contrary, the critiques of internationalism among Chinese intellectuals after the WWI provoked the community study to direct the exodus of the primitive society into renewed studies of frontiers, a powerful sociological path towards nation building in the cultural sense. The correspondence between community and frontier politics generated a dynamic analysis of the cultural boundary and therefore extended community into the cultural constitution of nation. Methodologically, this paper tries to depart from the two major frameworks of writing disciplinary history: reception and contact, and tries to rewrite the exchanges between intellectual thoughts from a sympathist perspective, i.e. the common sensibility of the intellectuals on world changes and theoretical minds. This perspective might help present the cosmopolitan nature of the Chinese academic histories.

Key words: culture contact, internationalism, community study, cultural boundary