代际流动的模式：理论理想型与中国现实

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文在疏理西方代际流动理论的基础上，提出流动模式的三种理想类型，并分析其制度条件和结构特征，希望能对当代中国社会流动的特征和趋势分析有所启发。本文认为，在不同的制度背景和社会条件下，相应的流动模式是不同的。本文提出三种理想类型对应于三种不同的社会类型，分别是（1）依据绩效原则的自由竞争模式，其特征是流动机会按个人能力和贡献分配，对应于完全市场制度的社会；（2）社会不平等结构下的家庭地位继承模式，其特征是家庭的社会经济背景对子女的地位获得有决定性的影响，社会的不平等结构因此而代代相传，如果一个社会的不平等程度越大，跨阶层流动越困难，代际的地位继承性特征越突出；（3）国家庇护流动模式，其特征是国家通过政策和制度设计，干预社会流动进程，特定的阶层将拥有更多的流动机会、或被剥夺应有的机会。文章最后对中国改革开放后流动模式的转变和现状提出了一些基本的判断。

关键词: 代际流动 , 理想类型 , 流动模式, 旅游开发 , 灾后重建 , 捆绑式发展 , 隐喻型政治

Abstract:

Based on the literature review of the intergenerational mobility studies in the West， this paper proposes three mobility patterns of the ideal type and analyzes their institutional prerequisites and structural properties， hoping to shed some light on the mobility characteristics and trends in China’s contemporary society. The paper contends that different constitutional contexts and societal conditions produce different mobility patterns. Three idealistic patterns correspond to three different societal types， respectively. First， mobility under the mode of meritocratic contest， characterized by mobility opportunities distributed according to the individuals’ competencies and contributions， is completely congruent with a society under market economy. Second， mobility under the mode of status inheritance， characterized by the familial socioeconomic background’s decisive impact on the status quo of the children， transmits the societal structure of inequality across generations： The wider the unequal gaps are， the more difficult the crossclass mobility becomes and the more prominent the intergenerational inheritance is. Third， mobility under the mode of state sponsorship is characterized by state intervening social mobility through policies and institutions： Certain classes are specified to have more mobility opportunities or to be deprived of such opportunities that they deserve. This paper finally presents some basic conclusions about the changes and current state of mobility patterns since the start of the reform in China.


Key words: the ideal type , intergenerational mobility , mobility pattern
, tourism development , , postdisaster reconstruction , , binding development , , metaphorical politics

李煜. 代际流动的模式：理论理想型与中国现实[J]. 社会杂志, 2009, 29(6): 60-84.

Li Yu. The Intergenerational Mobility Patterns， the Ideal Type， and the Chinese Reality　[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2009, 29(6): 60-84.

参考文献

参考文献
李路路．2006．再生产与统治——社会流动机制的再思考
[J]．社会学研究（2）．
孙立平．2003．断裂
[M]．北京：社会科学文献出版社．
Bell， Daniel. 1973.   The Coming of PostIndustrial Society： A Venture in Social Forecasting.   London： Heinemann. 
Bian， Yanjie. 1997. “Bringing Strong Ties Back In： Indirect Connection， Bridges， and Job Search in China.” American Sociological Review 62：266-285.
Blau， Peter. M. and O.D. Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. NY： Wiley.
Bourdieu， Pierre. 1974. “The School as A Conservative Force： Scholastic and Cultural Inequalities.” In Contemporary Research in the Sociology of Education， edited by J. Eggleston. London： Methuen. 
Breen， Richard （Ed.）. 2004. Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford： Oxford University Press.
Deng， Zhong and D. J. Treiman. 1997. “The Impact of the Cultural Revolution on Trends in Educational Attainment in the People’s Republic of China.” American Journal of Sociology 103：391-428.
Dessens， J.A.G.， W. Jansen， H.B.G. Ganzeboom， and P.G.M. van der Heijden. 2003. “Patterns and Trends in Occupational Attainment of First Jobs in the Netherlands， 1930-1995.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 166 （1）：63-84.
Erikson， Robert and J.H. Goldthorpe. 1992. The Constant Flux： A Study of Class .Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford： Clarendon Press.
Featherman，David L. and R. M. Hauser. 1978. Opportunity and Change. New York： Academic Press.
Ganzeboom， Harry B. G.， Ruud.Luijkx， and D.J. Treiman. 1989. “Intergenerational Class Mobility in Comparative Perspective.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility   8： 3-55.
Ganzeboom， Harry .B G.， D. J.Treiman， and Ultee， Wout C. 1991. “Comparative Intergenerational Mobility ResearchThree Generations and Beyond.”Annual Review of Sociology 17：277-302.
Goldthorpe， John H. 2000. On Sociology： Numbers， Narratives and the Integration of Research Theory. Oxford： Oxford University Press.
——. 2005. “Progress in Sociology： The Case of Social Mobility Research.” in Analyzing Inequality： Life Chances and Social Mobility in Comparative Perspective （Ch2）， edited by Stefan Svallfors. Stanford University Press .
     Goodman， LEO A. 2007. “Statistical Magic and/or Statistical Serendipity： An Age of Progress in the Analysis of Categorical Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 33：1-19.
Granovetter， Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78：1360-80.
Hauser， Robert M. 1979. “Some Exploratory Methods for Modeling Mobility Tables and Other CrossClassified Data.” Pp. 413-58 in Sociological Methodology， edited by Karl F. Schuessler. San Francisco： JosseyBass.
Heath， Anthony. 1981. Social Mobility. London： Fontana.
Hout， Michael. 1988. “More Universalism and Less Structural Mobility： The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s.” American Journal of Sociology （93）6： 1358-1400.
——. 2004. “Social Mobility and Inequality： A Review and an Agenda.” Ch. 26 in Social Inequality ， edited by Kathryn Neckerman. New York： Russell Sage Foundation.
Hout， Michael and Emily Beller. 2004. “Cohort Trends in Social Mobility： United States， 1972〖CD＊2〗2002.” in International Sociological Association Research Committee on Stratification and Mobility， edited by Rio de Janeiro， Brazil， 7 Aug 2004.
Kelley， Jonathan， Robert V. Robinson， and Herbert S. Klein. 1981. “A Theory of Social Mobility， with Data on Status Attainment in a Peasant Society.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 1：27-66.
Kerr， C.， Dunlop， J.T.， Harbison， F.H.， and Myers， C.A.， 1960/1973. Industrialism and Industrial Man： The Problems of Labour and the Management of Economic Growth. Cambridge Mass.： Harvard University Press.
Li， Bobai and Andrew G. Walder. 2001. “Career Advancement as Party Patronage： Sponsored Mobility into the Chinese Administrative Elite， 1949-1996.” American Journal of Sociology 106：1371-1408.
Lin， Nan. 1982. “Social Resources and Instrumental Action.” Pp. 131-45 in Social Structure and Network Analysis， edited by Peter V. Marsden and Nan Lin. Beverly Hills， CA： Sage.
Lin， Nan and Mary Dumin. 1986. “Access to Occupations through Social Ties.” Social Networks 8：365-86.
Mateju， Petr. 1993. “Who Won and Who Lost in A Socialist Redistribution in Czechoslovakia?” Pp. 251-271 in Persistent Inequality： Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries， edited by Y. Shavit and H.P. Blossfeld. Boulder： Westview Press.
Nee， Victor. 1989. “A Theory of Market Transition： From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism.” American Sociological Review 54：663-81.
——. 1996. “The Emergence of A Market Society： Changing Mechanisms of Stratification in China.” American Journal of Sociology 101：908-49.
Quah，Stella R. and Arnaud Sates. （eds）. 2000. 〖WT《XB》〗The International Handbook of Sociology， London：SAGE Publications.
Parkin， Frank. 1971.   Class Inequality and Political Order. New York： Praeger.
Parsons， Talcott. and R. Bales. 1956. Family， Socialization and Interaction Processes.   London： Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Parsons， Talcott.
[1971]1994. “Equality and Inequality in Modern Society， or Social Stratification Revisited.” in D.Grusky （ed.）， Social Stratification. Class， Race and Gender in Sociological Perspective. Boulder： Westview Press.
      Parish，Willian L. 1984. “Destratification in China.” in Class and Social Stratification in PostRevolution China. （edited by J. Watson） New York：Cambridge University Press. 
Simkus， A. and R. Andorka. 1982. “Inequalities in Education in Hungary 1923-1973.” American Sociological Review 47： 740-751.
Szel yi， Szonja. 1998. Equality by Design： The Grand Experiment in Destratification in Socialist Hungary. Stanford， CA： Stanford University Press.
      Titma， Mikk， Nancy Brandon Tuma， and Kadi Roosma. 2003. “Education as A Factor in Intergenerational Mobility in Soviet Society.” European Sociological Review 19：281-297. 
Torche， Florencia. 2005. “Unequal but Fluid： Social Mobility in Chile in Comparative Perspective.” American Sociological Review 70：422-50.
Treiman， Donald J. 1970. “Industrialization and Social Stratification.” Pp.207-234 in E.O. Laumann （ed.） Social Stratification： Research and Theory for the 1970s. Indianapolis BobbsMerrill.
Treiman， Donald J. and Harry B.G. Ganzeboom .2000. “The Fourth Generation of Comparative Stratification Research.” Pp. 123-150 in The International Handbook of Sociology. Sage. 
Treiman， Donald J.and Kambor Yip. 1989. “Educational and Occupational Attainment in 21 Countries.” Pp. 373-94 in CrossNational Research in Sociology， edited by Melvin L. Kohn. Beverly Hills， Calif.： Sage. 
Turner， Ralph. 1960. “Sponsored and Contest Mobility and the School System.” American Sociological Review 25：855-67.
Wright， Eric Olin and Donmoon Cho. 1992. “The Relative Permeability of Class Boundaries to CrossClass Friendships： A Comparative Study of the United States， Canada， Sweden， and Norway.” American Sociological Review   57：85-102.
Wu， Xiaogang and Donald J Treiman. 2004. “ The Household Registration System and Social Stratification in China： 1955-1996.” Demography   41（2）：363-84.
Young， M. 1958.   The Rise of the Meritocracy， 1870-2033： An Essay on Education and Equality.   Harmondsworth： Penguin. 
Zhou， Xueguang， Phyllis Moen， and Nancy B. Tuma. 1998. “Educational Stratification in Urban China： 1949-1994.” Sociology of Education 71：199-222.

责任编辑：劳勤

[1]	洪岩璧, 赵延东. 灾后重建中的资源再分配与健康不平等:基于三期汶川地震重建调查[J]. 社会杂志, 2019, 39(6): 214-237.
[2]	杨中超. 教育扩招促进了代际流动?[J]. 社会杂志, 2016, 36(6): 180-208.
[3]	盛智明. 社会流动与政治信任：基于CGSS2006数据的实证研究[J]. 社会杂志, 2013, 33(4): 35-59.
[4]	辛允星. “捆绑式发展”与“隐喻型政治”——对汶川地震灾区平坝羌寨的案例研究[J]. 社会杂志, 2013, 33(3): 159-183.
[5]	秦广强. 代际流动与外群体歧视——基于2005年全国综合社会调查数据的实证分析[J]. 社会杂志, 2011, 31(4): 116-136.