社会杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 138-170.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

“情”与“礼”之间:从“父子离心”到“父子一体”——以李安的“父亲三部曲”为例

李朔严(), 刘一艺   

  • 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 作者简介:李朔严  上海大学社会学院,E-mail: lishuoy@shu.edu.cn
    刘一艺  上海大学社会学院

Between Qing and Li: From Father-Son Estrangement to Father-Son Unity—A Case Study of Ang Lee's Father Trilogy

Shuoyan LI(), Yiyi LIU   

  • Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-03-17
  • About author:LI Shuoyan, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, E-mail: lishuoy@shu.edu.cn
    LIU Yiyi, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University

摘要:

本文以李安的电影“父亲三部曲”为研究对象,探讨当代中国社会中父子关系的冲突与重构机制:父子冲突的根源并不是简单的传统与现代的对立,而是源于“礼”的规范压抑了“情”的表达,使得双方虽内心有爱却变得彼此疏离。影片所呈现的和解并不是终局性的圆满,而是通过共享时间之“晕”实现的阶段性和解。本文强调,在家庭伦理规范经历转型的同时,情感逻辑作为稳定机制得以持续发挥作用,推动父子关系在矛盾中不断调适。本研究不仅有助于理解中国父子关系的变与常,也突破了传统—现代、东方—西方的对立框架,为跨文化背景下亲密关系的重建提供了解释视角。

关键词: 李安, 父子关系, 礼与情, 代际互动, 父亲三部曲

Abstract:

This article takes Ang Lee's Father Trilogy as a case study to examine the root causes of conflict and the mechanisms of reconfiguration in contemporary Chinese father-son relations. It argues that the tensions between fathers and sons depicted in the films do not stem solely from the clash between traditional and modern values, but are rooted in the structural repression of qing (affection) by the normative force of li (ritual/propriety) in Confucian ethics. When fathers, in the name of "it's for your own good", stubbornly uphold ritual demands such as patrilineal continuity and stern paternal authority, sons are caught in a constant tug-of-war between fulfilling filial obligations and pursuing self-realization. Building on the Confucian dialectic of qing and li, the article introduces the phenomenological notion of the halo of time, and shows that the repair of father-son relations is not a zero-sum game of unilateral concession. Rather, reconciliation emerges through shared memories and overlapping temporal experiences, in which the intertwining of retention, primal impression, and protention reactivates an original sense of kinship (qinqin zhi qing), thereby driving context-specific adjustments in ritual practice. However, even when fathers temporarily suspend their fixation on li and sons, through affective recognition, reconstruct their practice of filial piety, the deeper structural tension does not disappear. This is because male offspring are more tightly embedded in the pressure chain of family responsibility and thus confronted with a structural double bind in which paternal love always entails expectation, while the pursuit of freedom almost inevitably implies betraying that love. In sum, the article constructs an integrated analytical framework of qing-li-time, arguing that under conditions of loosening authority and family transformation, an affect-centered ethical logic still plays a crucial stabilizing and mediating role amid conflict. This study not only clarifies the dynamics of change in Chinese father-son relations but also provides a broadly applicable framework for understanding the emotional dynamics of kinship in cross-cultural contexts.

Key words: Ang Lee, father-son relationship, li and qing, intergenerational interaction, Father Trilogy