社会杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 27-55.

• 专题一:家庭与婚姻观念的变迁与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

家庭本位的“关系”实践:私人书信中的家庭主义图像(1972—1995年)

魏澜1, 张乐天2   

  1. 1. 复旦发展研究院;
    2. 复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院
  • 发布日期:2021-03-23
  • 作者简介:魏澜,E-mail:weilananthropology@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文得到复旦发展研究院“智库支持计划——当代中国社会生活研究”(IDH4300360/030)的支持。

Family-oriented Practice of Guanxi: Evidence from a Family's Private Letters(1972-1995)

WEI Lan1, ZHANG Letian2   

  1. 1. Fudan Development Institute;
    2. Social Development and Public Policy College, Fudan University
  • Published:2021-03-23
  • Supported by:
    This research is funded by "Zhiku Support Plan:Social Life Studies of Contemporary China" of Fudan Development Institute (IDH4300360/030).

摘要: 作为一种社会生活史资料,私人书信在人文社会科学研究中逐渐受到关注。本文基于一对伴侣在1972至1995年间922封私人书信的分析,力图通过民族志的整体性叙事方式,呈现其与家人在尝试“商调回沪”过程中的“关系”实践过程。这一过程包括“商调回沪”的具体策略、所涉及的关系网络、行动者的心理变化及其价值观的重塑等。本文发现,即使经历了一系列社会运动的思想改造,两位通信人的核心价值观始终都以家庭为本位。换言之,社会运动中的道德教化并未能转化为他们的道德行为,具有家族“偏私性”的家庭主义仍然在制度安排的夹缝中持续存在。

关键词: 私人书信, 家庭主义, 关系, 国家主义

Abstract: Private letters as a type of historical data of social life have attracted attention in humanities and social sciences research in recent years. Through a holistic ethnographic narrative, this study presented 922 personal letters written between 1972 to 1995 by a couple who and whose families during that period were in a concerted effort to negotiate a job transfer back to Shanghai so the family could be united. The letters revealed Guanxi in action such as adopting specific strategies and networks, psychological changes and value alterations of the people involved, and so forth. Throughout the 1970s and the 1980s, the three generations of direct families remained very close. Despite the numerous socialist movements during the period, familism stayed as the core value of the couple, who were family-oriented and family happiness was the ultimate goal of their life. "Family" in this study contains two levels of connotation. First, it refers to an idealized "small family", that is, a nuclear family composed of husband, wife and their children. Second, it refers to a conflicting yet interdependent "big family" composed by parents and siblings (including married siblings and their spouses). We further argue that the compulsory and coercive moral education of the socialist movements failed to reshape the moral behavior of the social actors while familism with family "partiality" continued to exist in the cracks of the mandatory institutional arrangements of the state and successfully resisted the statism.

Key words: private letters, familism, Guanxi, statism