社会杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 71-108.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会控制中的个体自由:从社会理论视角解读杜威的课程改革

杨勇()   

  • 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 作者简介:杨勇  上海大学社会学院, E-mail:yymengzi1992@shu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“比较现代化视野下的美国实用主义社会理论研究”(23CSH097)

Individual Freedom within Social Control: An Interpretation of Dewey's Curriculum Reform from Social Theory Perspective

Yong YANG()   

  • Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-03-17
  • About author:YANG Yong, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, E-mail: yymengzi1992@shu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the Youth Project of the National Social Science Fund "A Study of American Pragmatist Social Theory from the Perspective of Comparative Modernization"(23CSH097)

摘要:

本文通过分析和讨论杜威的课程改革,揭示“社会控制”这一美国社会理论中的标识性概念背后的实质内容与经验基础。在与进步教育人士的对话中,杜威明确反对“无需社会控制的个体自由”,主张“社会控制中的个体自由”。这一观点通过“实验学校”的课程改革具体展现出来。结合杜威设置的具体的课程内容,并运用“行动”与“环境”互动的分析框架,可进一步凸显社会控制的理论意涵。一方面,杜威批评卢梭主张的自然教育,强调个体行动必然受到社会环境的控制;另一方面,杜威与涂尔干主张的社会教育对话,将经由“刺激-反应”机制而激活的个体行动状态视为更重要的教育目标。杜威的社会控制概念形塑了美国早期社会理论的问题意识,且与费孝通提出的“教化权力”内涵相通。澄清这一关联,有助于我们反思个体自由与文明传统之间的复杂关系,并激发更有判断力的行动。

关键词: 社会控制, 杜威, 个体自由, 教育

Abstract:

This paper analyzes and discusses Dewey's curriculum reform to specifically reveal the substantive content and empirical basis underlying the iconic concept of "social control" in American social theory. In his dialogues with progressive educators, Dewey explicitly opposed the notion of "individual freedom without social control" and advocated instead for "individual freedom within social control". This viewpoint was concretely manifested through the curriculum reform of the Laboratory School. In the field of education, social control refers to teachers guiding students to immerse themselves in the "situations" presented by the curriculum through the implementation of curriculum plans and the use of teaching materials, so that students can perceive the guidance and control of social forces in terms of their behaviors, ideas and emotions. Applying an analytical framework that examines the interaction between "action" and "environment" further illuminates the theoretical implications of social control. On the one hand, Dewey engaged with Rousseau's theory of natural education, arguing that individual actions are inevitably controlled by the social environment, and the traditions of civilization hold indelible educational significance. On the other hand, he opposed Durkheimian social education, maintaining that social control that truly fulfills its educational function cannot be separated from individuals' internal responses, and arguing that activating individuals' behavioral states through the "stimulus-response" mechanism constitutes a more important educational end. Overall, Dewey sought to use the concept of social control to describe a state of life where individuals wholeheartedly "act" in an "environment" with inherent meaning, and on this basis, to reconceptualize the relationship between individual freedom and civilizations. Dewey's concept of social control shaped the problem awareness of early American social theory and is intrinsically consistent with the connotation of "the pedagogical power"(教化权力) as expounded by Hsiao-Tung Fei. Clarifying this connection will help us reflect on the complex relationship between individual freedom and civilized traditions, and inspires actions based on sound judgment.

Key words: social control, Dewey, individual freedom, education