While research on filial piety often emphasizes the unidirectional relationship from children to parents, intergenerational ties are inherently bidirectional. Changes in parental recognition of filial piety ethics not only illuminate their role expectations of their children but also serves as an important entry point for understanding the overall changes in traditional Chinese filial piety. This study proposes a family analysis framework that incorporates gender roles to explore the micro-foundation and social context underpinning the transformation of filial piety in China. Drawing on data from the 2014 China Family Panel Studies(CFPS), we leverage the exogenous variation in firstborn gender to identify its causal effects on parental binary filial piety recognition. On average, parents of daughters exhibit weaker endorsement of authoritarian filial piety yet show stronger recognition of reciprocal filial piety compared to parents of sons. This pattern arises from two key mechanisms. First, daughters' post-marital patrilocal residence disrupts traditional intergenerational co-residence arrangements, thereby diminishing parental adherence to authoritarian filial piety norms. Second, adult daughters are more likely to provide caregiving support during their parents'illnesses, fulfilling emotional expectations for affection and fostering greater parental recognition of reciprocal filial piety. Additionally, the declining fertility rates over the past four decades have brought about a significant shift in the gender composition of children, with families only having daughters becoming increasingly more common. Given that parents with only daughters exhibit lower recognition of authoritarian filial piety, this helps explain why there has been a decline in societal recognition of traditional filial piety ethics. By analyzing the changes in parental role expectations and ethical recognition, this study not only sheds light on the mechanisms driving the transformation and development of traditional Chinese culture but also offers a deeper understanding of the reconstruction of family ethics in the context of fertility transition.
The rapid proliferation of generative AI models has sparked critical inquiry into the hidden precarious labour infrastructures that help sustaining their performance. This article draws on ethnographic research conducted in three Chinese AI companies to examine how the production of large-scale models is made possible through intensive, low-paid and precarious data work. It argues that AI production is underpinned by a project-based labour regime structured with insourcing, outsourcing and crowdsourcing as its main organizational forms. The regime has systematically weakened the autonomy of labor, exacerbated the instability of labor, and presented significant characteristics of labor alienation. Rather than overt resistance, workers tend to display consent and acceptance of precarious conditions. In order to conceal the essence of its labor exploitation, capital employs three main strategies of normative control to exert hegemonic power over labor in order to create "willingness" on the part of labor. This study explores how such consent is being actively produced. Gamification mechanisms reframe exploitative work as cognitively stimulating and competitive; task modularisation and fast-changing project cycles lead to cyclical deskilling, curbing worker leverage and occupational mobility; and the symbolic valorisation of AI work fosters a sense of meaning and belonging in otherwise marginal roles. These mechanisms operate as technologies of consent, embedding hegemonic control within the everyday organisation of AI labour. This paper uncovers the paradoxical reality in contemporary AI production: how capital manufactures consent to "make human work like machines so that machines can appear more human". The findings extend classic labour process theory and contribute to a deeper understanding of labour organisation and control mechanisms in the age of artificial intelligence.